Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31490951›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2019

Prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria among kidney transplant recipients beyond two months post-transplant: A multicenter, prospective, cross-sectional study.

Julien Coussement, Anne Scemla, Jean-Michel Hougardy, Rebecca Sberro-Soussan, Lucile Amrouche, Concetta Catalano, James R Johnson, Daniel Abramowicz

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Julien CoussementDivision of Infectious Diseases, CUB-Hôpital Erasme, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-4302-6599
Anne ScemlaService de Néphrologie et Transplantation Adulte, Université Paris Descartes Sorbonne Paris Cité, RTRS Centaure, Labex Transplantex, Paris, France.
Jean-Michel HougardyService de Néphrologie, Dialyse et Transplantation Rénale, CUB-Hôpital Erasme, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Rebecca Sberro-SoussanService de Néphrologie et Transplantation Adulte, Université Paris Descartes Sorbonne Paris Cité, RTRS Centaure, Labex Transplantex, Paris, France.
Lucile AmroucheService de Néphrologie et Transplantation Adulte, Université Paris Descartes Sorbonne Paris Cité, RTRS Centaure, Labex Transplantex, Paris, France.
Concetta CatalanoService de Néphrologie, Dialyse et Transplantation Rénale, CUB-Hôpital Erasme, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
James R JohnsonMinneapolis Veterans Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.
Daniel AbramowiczDepartment of Nephrology-Hypertension, Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen and Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium.
Université Libre de Bruxelles · BEUniversité Paris Cité · FRAntwerp University Hospital · BEMinneapolis VA Health Care System · US

Funding

CSRD VA I01 CX000920
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring routine post-kidney transplant care, most European transplant physicians screen patients for asymptomatic bacteriuria. The usefulness of this strategy is debated. To make screening cost-effective, asymptomatic bacteriuria should be prevalent enough to justify the expense, and antibiotics should improve patient outcomes significantly if asymptomatic bacteriuria is detected. Regrettably, the prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria among kidney transplant recipients is not well defined.

methodsTo determine the prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria among kidney transplant recipients, we did a cross-sectional study among kidney transplant recipients undergoing routine surveillance in three outpatient transplant clinics in Belgium and France. We excluded patients who were in the first two months post-transplantation and/or had a urinary catheter. Asymptomatic participants who had a urine culture with one organism isolated at ≥ 105 CFU/mL were asked to provide a confirmatory urine specimen. Asymptomatic bacteriuria was defined per Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines.

resultsWe screened 500 consecutive kidney transplant recipients. Overall, the prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria was 3.4% (17/500 patients). It was similarly low among kidney transplant recipients who were between 2 and 12 months after transplantation (1.3%, 1/76 patients) and those who were farther after transplantation (3.8%, 16/424 patients: p = 0.49). Asymptomatic bacteriuria was significantly associated with female gender (risk ratio 3.7, 95% CI 1.3-10.3, p = 0.007) and older age (mean age: 61 ± 12 years [bacteriuric participants], versus 53 ± 15 years [non-bacteriuric participants], p = 0.03). One participant's colistin-resistant Escherichia coli isolate carried the globally disseminated mcr-1 gene.

conclusionsAmong kidney transplant recipients who are beyond the second month post-transplant, the prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria is low. Further studies are needed to ascertain the cost-effectiveness of a screen-and-treat strategy for asymptomatic bacteriuria in this population.

Indexed as

Asymptomatic DiseasesKidney TransplantationBacteriuriaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID31490951
PMCPMC6730876
OpenAlexW2971865856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.