Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31490949›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Analysis of properties of Ising and Kuramoto models that are preserved in networks constructed by visualization algorithms.

Daniel Gómez-Hernández, David García-Gudiño, Emmanuel Landa, Irving O Morales, Alejandro Frank

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniel Gómez-HernándezFacultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, México.
David García-GudiñoCentro de Ciencias de la Complejidad, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, México.ORCID 0000-0002-8696-6169
Emmanuel LandaCentro de Ciencias de la Complejidad, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, México.
Irving O MoralesCentro de Ciencias de la Complejidad, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, México.
Alejandro FrankCentro de Ciencias de la Complejidad, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, México.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently it has been shown that building networks from time series allows to study complex systems to characterize them when they go through a phase transition. This give us the opportunity to study this systems from a entire new point of view. In the present work we have used the natural and horizontal visualization algorithms to built networks of two popular models, which present phase transitions: the Ising model and the Kuramoto model. By measuring some topological quantities as the average degree, or the clustering coefficient, it was found that the networks retain the capability of detecting the phase transition of the system. From our results it is possible to establish that both visibility algorithms are capable of detecting the critical control parameter, as in every quantity analyzed (the average degree, the average path and the clustering coefficient) there is a minimum or a maximum value. In the case of the natural visualization algorithm, the average path results are much more noisy than in the other quantities in the study. Specially for the Kuramoto Model, which in this case does not allow a detection of the critical point at plain sight as for the other quantities. The horizontal visualization algorithm has proven to be more explicit in every quantity, as every one of them show a clear change of behavior before and after the critical point of the transition.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsModels, Statistical

Identifiers

PMID31490949
PMCPMC6730881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.