Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31490924›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2019

Epidemiology of capybara-associated Brazilian spotted fever.

Hermes R Luz, Francisco B Costa, Hector R Benatti, Vanessa N Ramos, Maria Carolina de A Serpa, Thiago F Martins, Igor C L Acosta, Diego G Ramirez, Sebastián Muñoz-Leal, Alejandro Ramirez-Hernandez and 19 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 126 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Anaplasmataceae circulation in wild mammals and ticks from Goiás state, midwestern Brazil.Revista brasileira de parasitologia veterinaria = Brazilian journal of veterinary parasitology : Orgao Oficial do Colegio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinaria · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Serological and Molecular Survey of Rickettsial Agents in Wild Boars (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Effects ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Hermes R LuzDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva e Saúde Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8200-6427
Francisco B CostaDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva e Saúde Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Hector R BenattiDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva e Saúde Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Vanessa N RamosDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva e Saúde Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Maria Carolina de A SerpaDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva e Saúde Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Thiago F MartinsDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva e Saúde Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Igor C L AcostaDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva e Saúde Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Diego G RamirezDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva e Saúde Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Sebastián Muñoz-LealDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva e Saúde Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Alejandro Ramirez-HernandezDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva e Saúde Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8689-5930
Lina C BinderDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva e Saúde Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Marcio Port CarvalhoInstituto Florestal, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Vlamir RochaCentro de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Araras, SP, Brazil.
Thiago C DiasCentro de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Araras, SP, Brazil.
Camila L SimeoniCentro de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Araras, SP, Brazil.
José Brites-NetoDepartamento de Vigilância Epidemiológica, Secretaria Municipal de Saúde, Americana, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7058-6604
Jardel BrasilDepartamento de Vigilância Epidemiológica, Secretaria Municipal de Saúde, Americana, SP, Brazil.
Ana Maria NievasDepartamento de Psicologia, Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Patricia Ferreira MonticelliDepartamento de Psicologia, Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9546-4160
Maria Estela G MoroDepartamento de Zootecnia, Faculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos, Universidade de São Paulo, Pirassununga, SP, Brazil.
Beatriz LopesDepartamento de Ciências Florestais, Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz, Universidade de São Paulo, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.
Daniel M AguiarPrograma de Pós-graduação em Ciências Veterinárias, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Cuiabá, MT, Brazil.
Richard C PachecoPrograma de Pós-graduação em Ciências Veterinárias, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Cuiabá, MT, Brazil.
Celso Eduardo SouzaLaboratório de Carrapatos, Superintendência de Controle de Endemias, Mogi Guaçu, SP, Brazil.
Ubiratan PiovezanEmbrapa Pantanal, Corumbá, MS, Brazil.
Raquel JulianoEmbrapa Pantanal, Corumbá, MS, Brazil.
Katia Maria P M B FerrazDepartamento de Ciências Florestais, Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz, Universidade de São Paulo, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.
Matias P J SzabóLaboratório de Ixodologia, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil.
Marcelo B LabrunaDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva e Saúde Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9675-3132
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal de São Carlos · BRBrazilian Agricultural Research Corporation · BRSecretaria Municipal de Saúde · BRUniversidade de Ribeirão Preto · BRUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso · BRDepartamento de Ciência e Tecnologia · BRInstituto Florestal · BRUniversidade Federal de Uberlândia · BRUniversidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBrazilian spotted fever (BSF), caused by the bacterium Rickettsia rickettsii, has been associated with the transmission by the tick Amblyomma sculptum, and one of its main hosts, the capybara (Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris).

methodsDuring 2015-2019, we captured capybaras and ticks in seven highly anthropic areas of São Paulo state (three endemic and four nonendemic for BSF) and in two natural areas of the Pantanal biome, all with established populations of capybaras.

resultsThe BSF-endemic areas were characterized by much higher tick burdens on both capybaras and in the environment, when compared to the BSF-nonendemic areas. Only two tick species (A. sculptum and Amblyomma dubitatum) were found in the anthropic areas; however, with a great predominance of A. sculptum (≈90% of all ticks) in the endemic areas, in contrast to a slight predominance of A. dubitatum (≈60%) in the nonendemic areas. Tick species richness was higher in the natural areas, where six species were found, albeit with a predominance of A. sculptum (≈95% of all ticks) and environmental tick burdens much lower than in the anthropic areas. The BSF-endemic areas were characterized by overgrowth populations of A. sculptum that were sustained chiefly by capybaras, and decreased populations of A. dubitatum. In contrast, the BSF-nonendemic areas with landscape similar to the endemic areas differed by having lower tick burdens and a slight predominance of A. dubitatum over A.sculptum, both sustained chiefly by capybaras. While multiple medium- to large-sized mammals have been incriminated as important hosts for A. sculptum in the natural areas, the capybara was the only important host for this tick in the anthropic areas.

conclusionsThe uneven distribution of R. rickettsii infection among A. sculptum populations in highly anthropic areas of São Paulo state could be related to the tick population size and its proportion to sympatric A. dubitatum populations.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrazilEcosystemIxodidaeRickettsia rickettsiiRocky Mountain Spotted FeverRodentiaSeroepidemiologic Studies

Identifiers

PMID31490924
PMCPMC6750615
OpenAlexW2971497698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.