Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31490855›Full record

ArticleJournal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition2019

Evaluation of Gastroesophageal Reflux in Children Born With Esophageal Atresia Using pH and Impedance Monitoring.

Floor W T Vergouwe, Michiel P van Wijk, Manon C W Spaander, Marco J Bruno, René M H Wijnen, Johannes M Schnater, Hanneke IJsselstijn

Open access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Clinical yield of esophagogastroduodenoscopy and pH-impedance testing in esophageal atresia patients performed according to international guidelines.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Floor W T VergouweDepartment of Pediatric Surgery and Intensive Care Children, Erasmus MC University Medical Center - Sophia Children's Hospital.
Michiel P van WijkDepartment of Pediatric Gastroenterology, VU University Medical Center & Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Academic Medical Center - Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Manon C W SpaanderDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam.
Marco J BrunoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam.
René M H WijnenDepartment of Pediatric Surgery and Intensive Care Children, Erasmus MC University Medical Center - Sophia Children's Hospital.
Johannes M SchnaterDepartment of Pediatric Surgery and Intensive Care Children, Erasmus MC University Medical Center - Sophia Children's Hospital.
Hanneke IJsselstijnDepartment of Pediatric Surgery and Intensive Care Children, Erasmus MC University Medical Center - Sophia Children's Hospital.
Erasmus MC · NLAcademic Medical Center · NLErasmus MC - Sophia Children’s Hospital · NLUniversity Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of the study was to evaluate acid and nonacid gastroesophageal reflux in infants and school-aged children with esophageal atresia (EA) using pH-impedance (pH-MII) monitoring.

methodsBetween 2012 and 2017, all 24-hour pH-MII studies performed in infants (≤18 months) and 8-year olds with EA were included. Antiacid therapy was discontinued before study. Exclusion criteria were: isolated tracheoesophageal fistula; esophageal replacement therapy; tube feeding; and monitoring <18 hours. Automatically detected retrograde bolus movements (RBM) were manually reviewed and modified/deleted if necessary.

resultsWe included 57 children (51% boys; 2% isolated EA; 44% thoracoscopic EA repair): 24 infants (median age 0.6 years) and 33 school-aged children (median age 8.2 years). Of the automatically detected 3313 RBM, 1292 were manually deleted from the tracings: 52% of nonacid RBM and 8% of acid RBM (mainly misinterpreted swallows or 1 event recognized as several events). In infants, median reflux index (RI; pH <4) was 2.6% (abnormal in n = 2), median RBM was 61 (62% nonacid, 58% mixed), and median of the mean BCT was 11 seconds. In older children, median RI was 0.3% (abnormal in n = 4), median RBM was 21 (64% nonacid; 75% mixed), and median of the mean BCT was 13 seconds.

conclusionsMost children with EA off medication have a normal RI, yet experience a significant number of nonacid RBM. After manual revision of the tracings, a high percentage of RBM was deleted. Our data show that automated impedance analysis software needs refinement for use in infants and children with EA and question the need for standard antiacid therapy in these patients.

Indexed as

Esophageal AtresiaEsophageal pH MonitoringChildElectric ImpedanceFemaleGastroesophageal RefluxHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalePredictive Value of TestsReference ValuesSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID31490855
PMCPMC6855319
OpenAlexW2972094716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.