Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31490796›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of nursing administration2019

Patient and Family Advisory Councils for Research: Recruiting and Supporting Members From Diverse and Hard-to-Reach Communities.

James D Harrison, Wendy G Anderson, Maureen Fagan, Edmondo Robinson, Jeffrey Schnipper, Gina Symczak, Martha B Carnie, Catherine Hanson, Jim Banta, Sherry Chen and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of nursing administration, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Approaches to optimize patient and family engagement in hospital planning and improvement: Qualitative interviews.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

James D HarrisonAuthor Affiliations: Assistant Professors (Drs Harrison and Duong), Associate Professor (Dr Anderson), Professor (Dr Auerbach), and Project Manager (Ms Chen), Division of Hospital Medicine, University of California San Francisco; Chief Experience Officer (Dr Fagan) and Director of Patient and Family Advisory Councils (Ms Hanson), University of Miami Health System, Florida; Chief Transformation Officer and Vice President (Dr Robinson), Christiana Care Health System, Wilmington, Delaware; Associate Professor (Dr Schnipper), Department of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Patient and Family Advisory Council Members (Ms Symczak and Mr Banta), Intensive Care Unit Patient & Family Advisory Council, University of California San Francisco; and Senior Patient Advisor (Ms Carnie) and Project Manager (Ms Wong), Center for Patients and Families, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Wendy G Anderson
Maureen Fagan
Edmondo Robinson
Jeffrey Schnipper
Gina Symczak
Martha B Carnie
Catherine Hanson
Jim Banta
Sherry Chen
Jonathan Duong
Celene Wong
Andrew D Auerbach

Funding

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute 3455
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe strategies to recruit and support members from hard-to-reach groups on research-focused Patient and Family Advisory Councils (PFACs).

backgroundEnsuring diverse representation of members of research PFACs is challenging, and few studies have given attention to addressing this problem.

methodsA qualitative study was conducted using 8 focus groups and 19 interviews with 80 PFAC members and leaders, hospital leaders, and researchers.

resultsRecruitment recommendations were: 1) utilizing existing networks; 2) going out to the community; 3) accessing outpatient clinics; and 4) using social media. Strategies to support inclusion were: 1) culturally appropriate communication methods; 2) building a sense of community between PFAC members; 3) equalizing roles between community members/leaders; 4) having a diverse PFAC leadership team; and 5) setting transparent expectations for PFAC membership.

conclusionIncreasing the diversity of research PFACs is a priority, and it is important to determine how best to engage groups that have been traditionally underrepresented.

Indexed as

Patient SelectionAdultAdvisory CommitteesCaliforniaCaregiversFamilyFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNursing ResearchQualitative ResearchResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID31490796
PMCPMC10985779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.