Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31490120›Full record

ArticleeLife2019

Entrained neuronal activity to periodic visual stimuli in the primate striatum compared with the cerebellum.

Masashi Kameda, Shogo Ohmae, Masaki Tanaka

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Consensus Paper: Models of Cerebellar Functions.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026
    Review
  5. Differential cannabinergic effects on temporal perception and production.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  6. Comparison of Signals from Cerebellar Purkinje Cells and Deep Nuclei during Temporal Prediction in Primates.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Temporal Information Processing in the Cerebellum and Basal Ganglia.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  12. Sensory and motor representations of internalized rhythms in the cerebellum and basal ganglia.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Central Thalamus: Gatekeeper or Processing Hub?The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  16. Temporal Prediction Signals for Periodic Sensory Events in the Primate Central Thalamus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Masashi KamedaDepartment of Physiology, Hokkaido University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0201-8493
Shogo OhmaeDepartment of Physiology, Hokkaido University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1726-4961
Masaki TanakaDepartment of Physiology, Hokkaido University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6177-1314

Funding

Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology 17H03539Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology 18H04928Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology 18H05523Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology 18J20197
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rhythmic events recruit neuronal activity in the basal ganglia and cerebellum, but their roles remain elusive. In monkeys attempting to detect a single omission of isochronous visual stimulus, we found that neurons in the caudate nucleus showed increased activity for each stimulus in sequence, while those in the cerebellar dentate nucleus showed decreased activity. Firing modulation in the majority of caudate neurons and all cerebellar neurons was proportional to the stimulus interval, but a quarter of caudate neurons displayed a clear duration tuning. Furthermore, the time course of population activity in the cerebellum well predicted stimulus timing, whereas that in the caudate reflected stochastic variation of response latency. Electrical stimulation to the respective recording sites confirmed a causal role in the detection of stimulus omission. These results suggest that striatal neurons might represent periodic response preparation while cerebellar nuclear neurons may play a role in temporal prediction of periodic events.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsCerebellumCorpus StriatumElectric StimulationFemaleMacaca fuscataMaleNeuronsPhotic Stimulationcaudate nucleusdentate nucleusneurosciencenonhuman primaterhythmsingle neurontemporal prediction

Identifiers

PMID31490120
PMCPMC6748823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.