Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31489919›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2019

Local Dot Motion, Not Global Configuration, Determines Dogs' Preference for Point-Light Displays.

Carla J Eatherington, Lieta Marinelli, Miina Lõoke, Luca Battaglini, Paolo Mongillo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Perception of animate motion in dogs.Frontiers in psychology · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Gravity-Dependent Animacy Perception in Zebrafish.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carla J EatheringtonLaboratory of Applied Ethology, Department of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, University of Padua, Viale dell'Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy. carlaeatherington12@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1209-8116
Lieta MarinelliLaboratory of Applied Ethology, Department of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, University of Padua, Viale dell'Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy. lieta.marinelli@unipd.it.
Miina LõokeLaboratory of Applied Ethology, Department of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, University of Padua, Viale dell'Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy. miina.looke@studenti.unipd.it.
Luca BattagliniDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padua, Via Venezia 8, 35131 Padova, Italy. luca.battaglini@unipd.it.
Paolo MongilloLaboratory of Applied Ethology, Department of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, University of Padua, Viale dell'Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy. paolo.mongillo@unipd.it.ORCID 0000-0001-8599-4005

Funding

Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Padova e Rovigo PhD GrantUniversità degli Studi di Padova BIRD178748/17
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual perception remains an understudied area of dog cognition, particularly the perception of biological motion where the small amount of previous research has created an unclear impression regarding dogs' visual preference towards different types of point-light displays. To date, no thorough investigation has been conducted regarding which aspects of the motion contained in point-light displays attract dogs. To test this, pet dogs (

Indexed as

biological motiondogexperiencepoint-light displayvisual perception

Identifiers

PMID31489919
PMCPMC6770411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.