ReviewAsian journal of andrology
Updates in penile prosthesis infections.
Review in Asian journal of andrology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preoperative penoscrotal swab microbiology and postoperative infection concordance in malleable penile prosthesis surgery: A prospective randomized study of skin antisepsis.International journal of impotence research · 2026Article
- Restoring sexual health and relationship quality through penile prosthesis implantation.Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2026Article
- Early complications after penile prosthesis surgery: findings from the PHOENIX multicenter registry.International journal of impotence research · 2026Article
- How to improve functional outcome of inflatable penile implant surgery? a narrative review.International journal of impotence research · 2025Review
- Infection following inflatable penile prosthesis placement: a real-world comparison of device selection and patient characteristics.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Article
- Does time of intraoperative exposure to the aerobiome increase microbial growth on inflatable penile prostheses?International journal of impotence research · 2025Article
- Nursing care for a patient with post-penile prosthesis implantation infection: a case report.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Emerging strategies for the prevention of bacterial biofilm in prosthetic surgery.Translational andrology and urology · 2024Review
- A multicenter investigation examining timing of penile prosthesis infection management and responsible organisms.International journal of impotence research · 2024Article
- Overcoming barriers to immediate penile implant salvage surgery: a narrative review.Translational andrology and urology · 2024Review
- Narrative review of immediate salvage for penile prosthesis infection.Translational andrology and urology · 2024Review
- Recent technological development of penile prosthesis: a literature review.Translational andrology and urology · 2024Review
- Patient selection, counseling and preparation for penile prosthesis.International journal of impotence research · 2023Review
- Multicenter surgical outcomes of penile prosthesis placement in patients with corporal fibrosis and review of the literature.International journal of impotence research · 2022Review
- Intraoperative use of vancomycin paste during penile prosthesis placement: initial outcomes.International journal of impotence research · 2022Article
- Narrative review of penile prosthetic implant technology and surgical results, including transgender patients.Translational andrology and urology · 2021Review
- Penile implant surgery-managing complications.Faculty reviews · 2021Review
- Patient Outcomes After Penile Prosthesis Placement with Concomitant Non-Reconstructive Urologic Procedures.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of UrologyArticle
- Ten-year experience with penile prosthetic surgery for the treatment of erectile dysfunction: outcomes of a tertiary referral center and predictors of early prosthetic infection.Asian journal of andrologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inflatable penile prostheses are an important tool in the treatment of medically refractory erectile dysfunction. One of the major complications associated with these prostheses is infections, which ultimately require device explanation and placement of a new device. Over the past several decades, significant work has been done to reduce infection rates and optimize treatment strategies to reduce patient morbidity. This article reviews the current state of knowledge surrounding penile prosthesis infections, with attention to the evidence for methods to prevent infection and best practices for device reimplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.