ArticleClinical rheumatology2020
Synovial fluid culture: agar plates vs. blood culture bottles for microbiological identification.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Assessment and diagnosis of the acute hot joint: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2023Pooled it
- Septic arthritis and prosthetic joint infections: microbial spectrum and evolving resistance patterns.Journal of bone and joint infection · 2026Article
- Prosthetic Knee Joint Infection Secondary toCase reports in infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Blood culture bottles meet the operating room: enhancing the diagnostic accuracy of infectious spondylitis through open microsurgical biopsy and intraoperative inoculation.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2024Article
- Native Joint Septic Arthritis.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Mitigating Concerns Over Transport Delays: An Analysis of Synovial Fluid Culture Results in Arthroplasty.Cureus · 2023Article
- Microbiology of hip and knee periprosthetic joint infections: a database study.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2022Article
- Microorganism Determination of 10 Proprietary Chinese Medicines for Children by Plate Culture or Membrane Filtration.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Article
- Detection of bacterial DNA in synovial fluid in dogs with arthritis: a comparison between bacterial culture and 16S rRNA polymerase chain reaction.Acta veterinaria Scandinavica · 2021Article
- Optimal microbiological sampling for the diagnosis of osteoarticular infection.EFORT open reviews · 2021Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesBacteriological diagnosis of septic arthritis (SA) is complicated. Agar plates are the main culture method and yields 40-60% of positive bacterial detection. Addition of bottled culture broth (Bactec®) as a method for detecting synovial microorganisms is common. The advantages of this method and the combination of both have not been thoroughly investigated. This study evaluates an added value of the Bactec culture broth as a single method or as combined with the agar-plate culture.
methodsAll culture aspirates of SA-suspected patients were analyzed. All cases with a positive result by either method were reviewed for background data and clinical diagnosis.
resultsOut of 5000 synovial fluid samples, a clinical diagnosis of SA was suspected in 1024 cases. Samples processed by both culture methods were extracted during the same event. Bactec® vials were positive for significant bacterial detection in 113/148 cases (76.4%) while agar-plate cultures were positive in only 96/154 (62.3%) representing higher sensitivity of 0.5 vs. 0.42 and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.76 vs. 0.62. Bacterial detection by both methods combined was positive in 137/221 (62%) and did not achieve a significant increment.
conclusionsThe Bactec® method has many advantages in bacteriological identification of synovial infection, including a broader identification spectrum, faster response time, and superior qualities of identification although being more expensive. This method has a better yield in detecting septic arthritis and might be considered a single method for synovial fluid culture in cases suspected for SA.Key Points• The Bactec method had improved detection rates.• Culturing by agar plates and Bactec revealed higher sensitivity and lower specificity.• The use of the blood culture bottles (Bactec system) alone will raise the detection rate of septic arthritis with lower false positive rates and at lower costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31489513What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.