ArticleDer Nervenarzt2020
[Psychiatric polypharmacy and electroconvulsive therapy in treatment-resistant depression].
Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Electroconvulsive therapy reduces suicidality and all-cause mortality in refractory depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of neurostimulation studies.Neuroscience applied · 2025Review
- The electro-convulsive therapy story of Africa, a systematic review.Discover mental health · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite its relevant medical risks, polypharmacy is common particularly among difficult to treat conditions, e.g. treatment refractory depression (TRD). According to numerous guidelines, electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is the treatment of choice in severe and treatment-resistant major depression due to the high effectiveness; however, to date limited data are available concerning the effects of ECT on the concomitant prescription of psychiatric medication.
methodsFor a retrospective explorative analysis of psychiatric polypharmacy (MED) in TRD, data from 58 inpatient treatments were collected. Due to depressive episodes, all patients received psychopharmacological treatment and cognitive behavioral therapy (MED group). Of the patients 29 also underwent ECT (ECT group). Using a modified drug burden index (mod-DBI), the psychiatric medication was quantified at admission (TP0), start (TP1) and termination of ECT (TP2) and discharge in the ECT group or in comparable periods in the MED group (TP3). Differences in distribution were tested with the t-test and alterations in measurements were tested by means of variance analysis (F-test).
resultsPatients treated with ECT showed higher mod-DBI values at TP0, mainly due to more frequent prescription of benzodiazepines (BZD), mood stabilizers (MS) and antipsychotic drugs (AP). At the beginning of the inpatient treatment (TP0-TP1) there was an increase in BZD use (in both groups); in the ECT group MS were reduced and AP increased. In the time interval TP1-TP3, BZD (in both groups) and AP (ECT group) were again less frequently prescribed and MS (ECT and MED group) were increased again. Excluding BZD, there was a significant increase in mod-DBI in both groups, whereas the mod-DBI no longer showed significant differences at TP2 and TP3.
conclusionThe data possibly indicate that patients with TRD who receive ECT during inpatient treatment already have a more extensive psychiatric medication at admission. Also, psychiatric medication appears to be increased less prominently when ECT is performed. These findings and the possibly associated long-term benefits should be addressed in future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.