ArticleCommunications in statistics. Case studies, data analysis and applications2015
Detection of Local DNA Copy Number Changes in Lung Cancer Population Analyses Using A Multi-Scale Approach.
Article in Communications in statistics. Case studies, data analysis and applications, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Frequency Ranking of Imaging Biomarkers for Lung Cancer Risk Stratification Using a Hybrid Elastic Net Method.Cancers · 2026Article
- Article
- Lung cancer clustering by identification of similarities and discrepancies of DNA copy numbers using maximal information coefficient.PloS one · 2024Article
- Discriminant Analysis of Lung Cancer Using Nonlinear Clustering of Copy Numbers.Cancer investigation · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Emerging advances in genomic sequencing have prompted the development of new computational methods for studying the genomic sources of human diseases. This paper presents a recent statistical approach for detection of local regions with significant copy number alterations (CNAs) in lung cancer population. Mapping such regions is of interest as they are potentially associated with lung cancer. Conventional application of multiple testing methods corresponds to testing for CNAs at each probe separately and thresholding the t-statistics as test statistics. Due to the large number of probes, this approach often fails to detect CNA regions. In contrast, the proposed method uses the heights of located peaks and improves the detection power. This is achieved by taking advantage of the spatial structure in the data as well as reducing the number of tests in the multiple comparisons problem. In copy number analysis, it is common to apply segmentation or change detection tools to each individual genomic sample. However, since segmentation results vary among subjects, it becomes difficult to find the common genomic regions in population analyses. Our approach solves this problem by performing the analysis using summary statistics to study at population level directly. Hence, the region detection is performed on the summary t-statistic map. The proposed method is applied to lung cancer data and shows promise for detection of local regions with significant CNAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.