Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31489261›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2019

Global distribution and diversity of

Daniele De Luca, Wiebe H C F Kooistra, Diana Sarno, Chetan C Gaonkar, Roberta Piredda

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Daniele De LucaDepartment of Integrative Marine Ecology, Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Napoli, Italy.
Wiebe H C F KooistraDepartment of Integrative Marine Ecology, Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Napoli, Italy.
Diana SarnoDepartment of Integrative Marine Ecology, Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Napoli, Italy.
Chetan C GaonkarDepartment of Integrative Marine Ecology, Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Napoli, Italy.
Roberta PireddaDepartment of Integrative Marine Ecology, Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Napoli, Italy.
Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Information on taxa distribution is a prerequisite for many research fields, and biological records are a major source of data contributing to biogeographic studies. The Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) and the Ocean Biogeographic Information System (OBIS) are important infrastructures facilitating free and open access to classical biological data from several sources in both temporal and spatial scales. Over the last ten years, high throughput sequencing (HTS) metabarcoding data have become available, which constitute a great source of detailed occurrence data. Among the global sampling projects that have contributed to such data are Tara Oceans and the Ocean Sampling Day (OSD). Integration of classical and metabarcoding data may aid a more comprehensive assessment of the geographic range of species, especially of microscopic ones such as protists. Rare, small and cryptic species are often ignored in surveys or mis-assigned with the classical approaches. Here we show how integration of data from various sources can contribute to insight in the biogeography and diversity at the genus- and species-level using

Indexed as

18S rDNABiodiversityBiogeographyBiological recordsChaetocerosGlobal distributionMarine diatomsMetabarcodingOSDTARA

Identifiers

PMID31489261
PMCPMC6705385
OpenAlexW2968747803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.