Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31489182›Full record

ArticleF1000Research2019

A refinement to the formalin test in mice.

Douglas M Lopes, Heather L Cater, Matthew Thakur, Sara Wells, Stephen B McMahon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F1000Research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Discovery of Novel NaResearch (Washington, D.C.) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Discovery of New 3-(Benzo[Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Mitochondria and sensory processing in inflammatory and neuropathic pain.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Douglas M LopesNeurorestoration Group, Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, King's College London SE1 1UL, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1056-9199
Heather L CaterMRC Harwell Institute, Harwell Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0RD, UK.
Matthew ThakurNeurorestoration Group, Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, King's College London SE1 1UL, London, UK.
Sara WellsMRC Harwell Institute, Harwell Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0RD, UK.
Stephen B McMahonNeurorestoration Group, Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, King's College London SE1 1UL, London, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council 53650Medical Research Council 53658Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 102645
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The constant refinement of tests used in animal research is crucial for the scientific community. This is particularly true for the field of pain research, where ethical standards are notably sensitive. The formalin test is widely used in pain research and some of its mechanisms resemble those underlying clinical pain in humans. Immediately upon injection, formalin triggers two waves (an early and a late phase) of strong, nociceptive behaviour, characterised by licking, biting, lifting and shaking the injected paw of the animal. Although well characterised at the behaviour level, since its proposal over four decades ago, there has not been any significant refinement to the formalin test, especially those combining minimisation of animal distress and preservation of behavioural outcomes of the test.  Here, we propose a modified and improved method for the formalin test. We show that anaesthetising the animal with the inhalable anaesthetic sevoflurane at the time of the injection can produce reliable, robust and reproducible results whilst animal distress during the initial phase is reduced. Importantly, our results were validated by pharmacological suppression of the behaviour during the late phase of the test with gabapentin, the anaesthetic showing no interference with the drug. In addition, we demonstrate that this is also a useful method to screen for changes in pain behaviour in response to formalin in transgenic lines.

Indexed as

FormaldehydePainPain MeasurementAnimalsBehavior, AnimalCatsMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLFormaldehyde3RsBehaviourFormalinNociceptionPainRefinement

Identifiers

PMID31489182
PMCPMC6707399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.