Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31488812›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

Space Station conditions are selective but do not alter microbial characteristics relevant to human health.

Maximilian Mora, Lisa Wink, Ines Kögler, Alexander Mahnert, Petra Rettberg, Petra Schwendner, René Demets, Charles Cockell, Tatiana Alekhova, Andreas Klingl and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Maximilian MoraMedical University of Graz, Department of Internal Medicine, Auenbruggerplatz 15, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Lisa WinkMedical University of Graz, Department of Internal Medicine, Auenbruggerplatz 15, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Ines KöglerMedical University of Graz, Department of Internal Medicine, Auenbruggerplatz 15, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Alexander MahnertMedical University of Graz, Department of Internal Medicine, Auenbruggerplatz 15, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Petra RettbergGerman Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Aerospace Medicine, Radiation Biology Department, Research Group Astrobiology, Linder Höhe, 51147, Cologne, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4439-2395
Petra SchwendnerUniversity of Edinburgh, School of Physics and Astronomy, James Clerk Maxwell Building, Peter Guthrie Tait Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3FD, UK.
René DemetsEuropean Space Research and Technology Centre (ESTEC), Keplerlaan 1, 2201 AZ, Noordwijk, The Netherlands.
Charles CockellUniversity of Edinburgh, School of Physics and Astronomy, James Clerk Maxwell Building, Peter Guthrie Tait Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3FD, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3662-0503
Tatiana AlekhovaLomonosov Moscow State University, Biological Faculty, ul. Leninskiye Gory, 1, стр. 12, Moscow, Russia.
Andreas KlinglLudwig Maximilians University of Munich, Plant Development and Electron Microscopy, Department of Biology I, Biocenter, Großhaderner Str. 2, 82152, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.
Robert KrauseMedical University of Graz, Department of Internal Medicine, Auenbruggerplatz 15, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Anna ZolotariofUniversity of Edinburgh, School of Physics and Astronomy, James Clerk Maxwell Building, Peter Guthrie Tait Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3FD, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0120-3753
Alina AlexandrovaLomonosov Moscow State University, Biological Faculty, ul. Leninskiye Gory, 1, стр. 12, Moscow, Russia.
Christine Moissl-EichingerMedical University of Graz, Department of Internal Medicine, Auenbruggerplatz 15, 8036, Graz, Austria. christine.moissl-eichinger@medunigraz.at.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The International Space Station (ISS) is a unique habitat for humans and microorganisms. Here, we report the results of the ISS experiment EXTREMOPHILES, including the analysis of microbial communities from several areas aboard at three time points. We assess microbial diversity, distribution, functional capacity and resistance profile using a combination of cultivation-independent analyses (amplicon and shot-gun sequencing) and cultivation-dependent analyses (physiological and genetic characterization of microbial isolates, antibiotic resistance tests, co-incubation experiments). We show that the ISS microbial communities are highly similar to those present in ground-based confined indoor environments and are subject to fluctuations, although a core microbiome persists over time and locations. The genomic and physiological features selected by ISS conditions do not appear to be directly relevant to human health, although adaptations towards biofilm formation and surface interactions were observed. Our results do not raise direct reason for concern with respect to crew health, but indicate a potential threat towards material integrity in moist areas.

Indexed as

HealthSpace FlightArchaeaBacteriaBiodiversityBiofilmsExtremophilesFungiHost Microbial InteractionsHumansMetagenomicsMicrobiotaPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID31488812
PMCPMC6728350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.