Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31488716›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Lgr5

Chow Hiang Ang, Shih Han Hsu, Fusheng Guo, Chong Teik Tan, Victor C Yu, Jane E Visvader, Pierce K H Chow, Nai Yang Fu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Chow Hiang AngCancer and Stem Cell Biology Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, 169857 Singapore.
Shih Han HsuCancer and Stem Cell Biology Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, 169857 Singapore.
Fusheng GuoCancer and Stem Cell Biology Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, 169857 Singapore.
Chong Teik TanDepartment of Pharmacy, National University of Singapore, 117543 Singapore.
Victor C YuDepartment of Pharmacy, National University of Singapore, 117543 Singapore.
Jane E VisvaderStem Cells and Cancer Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
Pierce K H ChowOffice of Clinical Sciences, Duke-NUS Medical School, 169857 Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-0584-2584
Nai Yang FuCancer and Stem Cell Biology Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, 169857 Singapore; naiyang.fu@duke-nus.edu.sg.
National University of Singapore · SGDuke-NUS Medical School · SGSingapore General Hospital · SGThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emerging evidence suggests that hepatocytes are primarily maintained by self-renewal during normal liver homeostasis, as well as in response to a wide variety of hepatic injuries. However, how hepatocytes in distinct anatomic locations within the liver lobule are replenished under homeostasis and injury-induced regeneration remains elusive. Using a newly developed bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC)-transgenic mouse model, we demonstrate that

Indexed as

AnimalsCarcinoma, HepatocellularCell DifferentiationCell LineageCell ProliferationDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHepatocytesHumansLiverLiver NeoplasmsLiver RegenerationMaleMiceMice, TransgenicReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledLGR5 protein, humanLgr5 protein, mouseReceptors, G-Protein-Coupledhepatocellular carcinomahepatocyteLgr5lineage tracingliver regeneration

Identifiers

PMID31488716
PMCPMC6765306
OpenAlexW2971915501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.