Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31488611›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2019

Robust Control in Human Reaching Movements: A Model-Free Strategy to Compensate for Unpredictable Disturbances.

Frédéric Crevecoeur, Stephen H Scott, Tyler Cluff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Human Steering Control Under Unpredictable Disturbances.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Proprioceptive and Visual Feedback Responses in Macaques Exploit Goal Redundancy.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Frédéric CrevecoeurInstitute of information Technologies, Electronics, and Applied Mathematics, frederic.crevecoeur@uclouvain.be.ORCID 0000-0002-1147-1153
Stephen H ScottCentre for Neuroscience Studies.
Tyler CluffFaculty of Kinesiology, and.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current models of motor learning suggest that multiple timescales support adaptation to changes in visual or mechanical properties of the environment. These models capture patterns of learning and memory across a broad range of tasks, yet do not consider the possibility that rapid changes in behavior may occur without adaptation. Such changes in behavior may be desirable when facing transient disturbances, or when unpredictable changes in visual or mechanical properties of the task make it difficult to form an accurate model of the perturbation. Whether humans can modulate control strategies without an accurate model of the perturbation remains unknown. Here we frame this question in the context of robust control (

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalAdultAlgorithmsArmElectromyographyFeedback, PsychologicalFemaleHumansLearningMaleMiddle AgedModels, NeurologicalMuscle, SkeletalPsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeYoung Adultmotor adaptationoptimal feedback controlreaching controlrobust control

Identifiers

PMID31488611
PMCPMC6786821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.