Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31488498›Full record

ArticleBMJ health & care informatics2019

Phishing in healthcare organisations: threats, mitigation and approaches.

Ward Priestman, Tony Anstis, Isabel G Sebire, Shankar Sridharan, Neil J Sebire

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ health & care informatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The Role of Cybersecurity Education in Nigeria's Healthcare Sector.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ward PriestmanDRIVE (Digital Research, Informatics and Virtual Environments), Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children / NIHR GOSH BRC, London, UK.
Tony AnstisDRIVE (Digital Research, Informatics and Virtual Environments), Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children / NIHR GOSH BRC, London, UK.
Isabel G SebireDRIVE (Digital Research, Informatics and Virtual Environments), Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children / NIHR GOSH BRC, London, UK.
Shankar SridharanDRIVE (Digital Research, Informatics and Virtual Environments), Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children / NIHR GOSH BRC, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHealthcare data have significant value as a potential target for hackers. Phishing is a method of exploitation for malicious reasons using targeted communications (email/messaging). This study reports on an internal evaluation targeting hospital staff and summarises peer-reviewed literature regarding phishing and healthcare.

methodsAn assessment was performed as part of cybersecurity activity during a designated test period using multiple credential harvesting approaches through staff email. We also searched the medical-related literature to identify relevant phishing-related publications.

resultsDuring the 1-month testing period, the organisation received 858 200 emails: 139 400 (16%) marketing, 18 871 (2%) identified as potential threats. Of 143 million internet transactions, around 5 million (3%) were suspected threats. 468 employee email addresses were identified from public data and targeted through phishing using a range of payloads including attachments and malicious links; however, no credentials were recovered or malicious files downloaded. Several hospital employees were, however, identified on social media profiles, including some tricked into accepting false friend requests. DISCUSSION: Healthcare organisations are increasingly moving to digital systems, but healthcare professionals have limited awareness of threats. Increasing emphasis on 'cyberhygiene' and information governance through mandatory training increases understanding of these risks. While no credentials were harvested in this study, since up to 5% of emails/internet traffic are suspicious, the need for robust firewalls, cybersecurity infrastructure, IT policies and, most importantly of all, staff training, is emphasised.

conclusionHospitals receive a significant volume of potentially malicious emails. While many staff appear to be aware of phishing and respond appropriately, ongoing education is required across the spectrum of cybersecurity, with specific emphasis around 'leakage' of information on social media.

Indexed as

AwarenessDeceptionElectronic MailComputer SecurityDelivery of Health CareHospitalsHumansPersonnel, HospitalRisk ManagementSocial Mediaemailphishingsocialthreatvulnerability

Identifiers

PMID31488498
PMCPMC7062337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.