Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31488484›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Mental health specialist video consultations for patients with depression or anxiety disorders in primary care: protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility trial.

Justus Tönnies, Mechthild Hartmann, Michel Wensing, Joachim Szecsenyi, Andrea Icks, Hans-Christoph Friederich, Markus W Haun

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Justus TönniesDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Mechthild HartmannDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Michel WensingDepartment of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Joachim SzecsenyiDepartment of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Andrea IcksInstitute of Health Services Research and Health Economics, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Hans-Christoph FriederichDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Markus W HaunDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany markus.haun@med.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID 0000-0003-1851-3747
Heidelberg University · DEDeutsches Diabetes-Zentrum e.V. · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMost people suffering from depression and anxiety disorders are entirely treated in primary care. Due to growing challenges in ageing societies, for example, patients' immobility and multimorbidity, the transition to specialised care becomes increasingly difficult. Although the co-location of general practitioners and mental health specialists improves the access to psychosocial care, integrated in-person approaches are not practical for rural and single-doctor practices with limited personnel and financial resources. Treating primary care patients via internet-based video consultations by remotely located mental health specialists bears the potential to overcome structural barriers and provide low-threshold care. The aim of this randomised controlled feasibility trial is to investigate the feasibility of implementing of mental health specialist video consultations in primary care practices. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Fifty primary care patients with significant depression and/or anxiety symptomatology will be randomised in two groups receiving either the treatment as usual as provided by their general practitioner or up to five video consultations conducted by a mental health specialist. The video consultations focus on (1) systematic diagnosis plus proactive monitoring using validated clinical rating scales, (2) the establishment of an effective working alliance and (3) a stepped-care algorithm within integrated care adjusting treatments based on clinical outcomes. We will investigate the following outcomes: effectiveness of the recruitment strategies, patient acceptance of randomisation, practicability of the technical and logistical processes related to implementing video consultations in the practices' workflows, feasibility of the data collection and clinical parameters. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This trial has undergone ethical scrutiny and has been approved by the Medical Faculty of the University of Heidelberg Ethics Committee (S-634/2018). The findings will be disseminated to the research community through presentations at conferences and publications in scientific journals. This feasibility trial will prepare the ground for a large-scale, fully powered randomised controlled trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00015812.

Indexed as

Mental Health ServicesRemote ConsultationAnxiety DisordersDepressionFeasibility StudiesGeneral PracticeHumansInternetPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient SelectionPrimary Health CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicVideoconferencingfeasibilitymental healthprimary caretelemedicinevideo consultations

Identifiers

PMID31488484
PMCPMC6731787
OpenAlexW2971418252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.