Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31488465›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2019

Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSPSC): a systematic review of the psychometric properties of 62 international studies.

Patrick Waterson, Eva-Maria Carman, Tanja Manser, Antje Hammer

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06926504 (TeamBirth - an Intervention to Improve Patient Safety and Person-centered Care During Childbirth), which is not on this map. Cited by 51 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06926504 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

TeamBirth - an Intervention to Improve Patient Safety and Person-centered Care During Childbirth

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorKarolinska InstitutetRan2024 to 2029Enrolled800,000ConditionsPerson Centered Care, Patient Safety, Patient SatisfactionArmsThe care process S-TeamBirth, S-TeamBirth
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Patient Safety Culture in Latin American Hospitals: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Exploring the development of safety culture among physicians with text mining of patient safety reports: a retrospective study.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Patrick WatersonHuman Factors and Complex Systems Group, Design School, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK P.Waterson@lboro.ac.uk.
Eva-Maria CarmanTrent Simulation and Clinical Skills Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8509-9788
Tanja ManserUniversity of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern, Olten, Switzerland.
Antje HammerInstitute for Patient Safety, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2724-9901

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo carry out a systematic review of the psychometric properties of international studies that have used the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSPSC).

designLiterature review and an analysis framework to review studies.

settingHospitals and other healthcare settings in North and South America, Europe, the Near East, the Middle East and the Far East. DATA SOURCES: A total of 62 studies and 67 datasets made up of journal papers, book chapters and PhD theses were included in the review. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Psychometric properties (eg, internal consistency) and sample characteristics (eg, country of use, participant job roles and changes made to the original version of the HSPSC).

resultsJust over half (52%) of the studies in our sample reported internal reliabilities lower than 0.7 for at least six HSPSC dimensions. The dimensions 'staffing', 'communication openness', 'non-punitive response to error', 'organisational learning' and 'overall perceptions of safety' resulted in low internal consistencies in a majority of studies. The outcomes from assessing construct validity were reported in 60% of the studies. Most studies took place in a hospital setting (84%); the majority of survey participants (62%) were drawn from nursing and technical staff. Forty-two per cent of the studies did not state what modifications, if any, were made to the original US version of the instrument.

conclusionsWhile there is evidence of a growing worldwide trend in the use of the HSPSC, particularly within Europe and the Near/Middle East, our review underlines the need for caution in using the instrument. Future use of the HSPSC needs to be sensitive to the demands of care settings, the target population and other aspects of the national and local healthcare contexts. There is a need to develop guidelines covering procedures for using, adapting and translating the HSPSC, as well as reporting findings based on its use.

Indexed as

Hospital AdministrationPatient SafetyPsychometricsSafety ManagementHumansInternationalityinternational studiespatient safety culturepsychometrics

Identifiers

PMID31488465
PMCPMC6731893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.