Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31488215›Full record

ReviewMicrobiome2019

Challenges in the construction of knowledge bases for human microbiome-disease associations.

Varsha Dave Badal, Dustin Wright, Yannis Katsis, Ho-Cheol Kim, Austin D Swafford, Rob Knight, Chun-Nan Hsu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbiome, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. DiMB-RE: mining the scientific literature for diet-microbiome associations.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. The gut microbiome as a modulator of arterial function and age-related arterial dysfunction.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. KG-Hub-building and exchanging biological knowledge graphs.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Knowledge-Based Biomedical Data Science.Annual review of biomedical data science · 2020
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Varsha Dave BadalCenter for Microbiome Innovation, Jacobs School of Engineering, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Dustin WrightCenter for Microbiome Innovation, Jacobs School of Engineering, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Yannis KatsisScalable Knowledge Intelligence, IBM Research-Almaden, 650 Harry Road, San Jose, CA 95120, USA.
Ho-Cheol KimScalable Knowledge Intelligence, IBM Research-Almaden, 650 Harry Road, San Jose, CA 95120, USA.
Austin D SwaffordCenter for Microbiome Innovation, Jacobs School of Engineering, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Rob KnightCenter for Microbiome Innovation, Jacobs School of Engineering, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Chun-Nan HsuCenter for Microbiome Innovation, Jacobs School of Engineering, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA. chunnan@ucsd.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5240-4707

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The last few years have seen tremendous growth in human microbiome research, with a particular focus on the links to both mental and physical health and disease. Medical and experimental settings provide initial sources of information about these links, but individual studies produce disconnected pieces of knowledge bounded in context by the perspective of expert researchers reading full-text publications. Building a knowledge base (KB) consolidating these disconnected pieces is an essential first step to democratize and accelerate the process of accessing the collective discoveries of human disease connections to the human microbiome. In this article, we survey the existing tools and development efforts that have been produced to capture portions of the information needed to construct a KB of all known human microbiome-disease associations and highlight the need for additional innovations in natural language processing (NLP), text mining, taxonomic representations, and field-wide vocabulary standardization in human microbiome research. Addressing these challenges will enable the construction of KBs that help identify new insights amenable to experimental validation and potentially clinical decision support.

Indexed as

Data MiningKnowledge BasesMicrobiotaNatural Language ProcessingHumansDiseaseHumanKnowledge baseMicrobesMicrobiomeMicrobiome dynamicsModel organismsNatural language processing

Identifiers

PMID31488215
PMCPMC6728997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.