Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31488213›Full record

Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2019

Co-administration of iloprost and eptifibatide in septic shock (CO-ILEPSS)-a randomised, controlled, double-blind investigator-initiated trial investigating safety and efficacy.

Rasmus Ehrenfried Berthelsen, Sisse Rye Ostrowski, Morten Heiberg Bestle, Per Ingemar Johansson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02204852 (Safety and Efficacy of Iloprost and Eptifibatide Co-administration Compared to Standard Therapy in Patients With Septic Shock - a Randomized, Controlled, Double-blind Investigator-initiated Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02204852 phase2completednot on this map

Safety and Efficacy of Iloprost and Eptifibatide Co-administration Compared to Standard Therapy in Patients With Septic Shock - a Randomized, Controlled, Double-blind Investigator-initiated Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSisse R. Ostrowski, MD PhD DMScRan2014 to 2016Enrolled18ConditionsSeptic ShockArmsIloprost+eptifibatide, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Refractory septic shock: our updated pragmatic approach.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Prostacyclin for Patients with Septic Shock: Promise, Progress, and Perspective.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Rasmus Ehrenfried BerthelsenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. rab@regionsjaelland.dk.ORCID 0000-0003-1945-0944
Sisse Rye OstrowskiDepartment of Clinical Immunology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Morten Heiberg BestleDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Per Ingemar JohanssonSection for Transfusion Medicine, Capital Region Blood Bank, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Iceland · IS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPart of the pathophysiology in septic shock is a progressive activation of the endothelium and platelets leading to widespread microvascular injury with capillary leakage, microthrombi and consumption coagulopathy. Modulating the inflammatory response of endothelium and thrombocytes might attenuate this vicious cycle and improve outcome.

methodThe CO-ILEPSS trial was a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, pilot trial. Patients admitted to the intensive care unit with septic shock were randomised and allocated in a 2:1 ratio to active treatment with dual therapy of iloprost 1 ng/kg/min and eptifibatide 0.5 μg/kg/min for 48 h or placebo. The primary outcomes were changes in biomarkers reflecting endothelial activation and disruption, platelet consumption and fibrinolysis. We compared groups with mixed models, post hoc Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Mann-Whitney U test.

resultsWe included 24 patients of which 18 (12 active, 6 placebo) completed the full 7-day trial period and were included in the per-protocol analyses of the primary outcomes. Direct comparison between groups showed no differences in the primary outcomes. Analyses of within-group delta values revealed that biomarkers of endothelial activation and disruption changed differently between groups with increasing levels of thrombomodulin (p = 0.03) and nucleosomes (p = 0.02) in the placebo group and decreasing levels of sE-Selectin (p = 0.007) and sVEGFR1 (p = 0.005) in the active treatment group. Platelet count decreased the first 48 h in the placebo group (p = 0.049) and increased from baseline to day 7 in the active treatment group (p = 0.023). Levels of fibrin monomers declined in the active treatment group within the first 48 h (p = 0.048) and onwards (p = 0.03). Furthermore, there was a significant reduction in SOFA score from 48 h (p = 0.024) and onwards in the active treatment group. Intention-to-treat analyses of all included patients showed no differences in serious adverse events including bleeding, use of blood products or mortality.

conclusionOur results could indicate benefit from the experimental treatment with reduced endothelial injury, reduced platelet consumption and ensuing reduction in fibrinolytic biomarkers along with improved SOFA score. The results of the CO-ILEPSS trial are exploratory and hypothesis generating and warrant further investigation in a large-scale trial.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.com, NCT02204852 (July 30, 2014); EudraCT no. 2014-002440-41.

Indexed as

AdultAgedDouble-Blind MethodDrug CombinationsEptifibatideFemaleHumansIloprostMaleMiddle AgedOrgan Dysfunction ScoresSeverity of Illness IndexShock, SepticStatistics, NonparametricTreatment OutcomeDrug CombinationsEptifibatideIloprostEndotheliumEptifibatideIloprostInfectionPathologic processesPlatelet aggregation inhibitorsPlateletsSeptic shock

Identifiers

PMID31488213
PMCPMC6727583
OpenAlexW2971846941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.