Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2019
Co-administration of iloprost and eptifibatide in septic shock (CO-ILEPSS)-a randomised, controlled, double-blind investigator-initiated trial investigating safety and efficacy.
Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02204852 (Safety and Efficacy of Iloprost and Eptifibatide Co-administration Compared to Standard Therapy in Patients With Septic Shock - a Randomized, Controlled, Double-blind Investigator-initiated Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Safety and Efficacy of Iloprost and Eptifibatide Co-administration Compared to Standard Therapy in Patients With Septic Shock - a Randomized, Controlled, Double-blind Investigator-initiated Trial
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Iloprost for the Treatment of Severe Septic Shock with Persistent Hypoperfusion: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2025Trial
- Iloprost and Organ Dysfunction in Adults With Septic Shock and Endotheliopathy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2024Trial
- The efficacy of aspirin to inhibit platelet aggregation in patients hospitalised with a severe infection: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2023Trial
- The effect of prostacyclin infusion on markers of endothelial activation and damage in mechanically ventilated patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.Journal of critical care · 2022Trial
- Prostacyclin in Intubated Patients with COVID-19 and Severe Endotheliopathy: A Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2022Trial
- Refractory septic shock: our updated pragmatic approach.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2026Review
- Evaluation of the real-world safety of eptifibatide in the treatment of ARDS: results of a disproportionality analysis of FAERS data.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Prostacyclin for Patients with Septic Shock: Promise, Progress, and Perspective.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2025Article
- Immunothrombosis in Sepsis: Cellular Crosstalk, Molecular Triggers, and Therapeutic Opportunities-A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- The Crucial Roles of Platelets as Immune Mediators in Sepsis.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Review
- Efficacy and safety of a 72-h infusion of prostacyclin (1 ng/kg/min) in mechanically ventilated patients with pulmonary infection and endotheliopathy-protocol for the multicenter randomized, placebo-controlled, blinded, investigator-initiated COMBAT-ARF trial.Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2025Article
- Eptifibatide, an Older Therapeutic Peptide with New Indications: From Clinical Pharmacology to Everyday Clinical Practice.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Microcirculation-guided resuscitation in sepsis: the next frontier?Frontiers in medicine · 2023Review
- SHock-INduced Endotheliopathy (SHINE): A mechanistic justification for viscoelastography-guided resuscitation of traumatic and non-traumatic shock.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Review
- Endothelial dysfunction and immunothrombosis in sepsis.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- Current practice and evolving concepts in septic shock resuscitation.Intensive care medicine · 2022Review
- Activated neutrophils in the initiation and progression of COVID-19: hyperinflammation and immunothrombosis in COVID-19.American journal of translational research · 2022Review
- Sepsis-Associated Coagulopathy Predicts Hospital Mortality in Critically Ill Patients With Postoperative Sepsis.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Severe mesenteric traction syndrome is associated with increased systemic inflammatory response, endothelial dysfunction, and major postoperative morbidity.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2021Article
- Efficacy and safety of iloprost in trauma patients with haemorrhagic shock-induced endotheliopathy-Protocol for the multicentre randomized, placebo-controlled, blinded, investigator-initiated shine-trauma trial.Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPart of the pathophysiology in septic shock is a progressive activation of the endothelium and platelets leading to widespread microvascular injury with capillary leakage, microthrombi and consumption coagulopathy. Modulating the inflammatory response of endothelium and thrombocytes might attenuate this vicious cycle and improve outcome.
methodThe CO-ILEPSS trial was a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, pilot trial. Patients admitted to the intensive care unit with septic shock were randomised and allocated in a 2:1 ratio to active treatment with dual therapy of iloprost 1 ng/kg/min and eptifibatide 0.5 μg/kg/min for 48 h or placebo. The primary outcomes were changes in biomarkers reflecting endothelial activation and disruption, platelet consumption and fibrinolysis. We compared groups with mixed models, post hoc Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Mann-Whitney U test.
resultsWe included 24 patients of which 18 (12 active, 6 placebo) completed the full 7-day trial period and were included in the per-protocol analyses of the primary outcomes. Direct comparison between groups showed no differences in the primary outcomes. Analyses of within-group delta values revealed that biomarkers of endothelial activation and disruption changed differently between groups with increasing levels of thrombomodulin (p = 0.03) and nucleosomes (p = 0.02) in the placebo group and decreasing levels of sE-Selectin (p = 0.007) and sVEGFR1 (p = 0.005) in the active treatment group. Platelet count decreased the first 48 h in the placebo group (p = 0.049) and increased from baseline to day 7 in the active treatment group (p = 0.023). Levels of fibrin monomers declined in the active treatment group within the first 48 h (p = 0.048) and onwards (p = 0.03). Furthermore, there was a significant reduction in SOFA score from 48 h (p = 0.024) and onwards in the active treatment group. Intention-to-treat analyses of all included patients showed no differences in serious adverse events including bleeding, use of blood products or mortality.
conclusionOur results could indicate benefit from the experimental treatment with reduced endothelial injury, reduced platelet consumption and ensuing reduction in fibrinolytic biomarkers along with improved SOFA score. The results of the CO-ILEPSS trial are exploratory and hypothesis generating and warrant further investigation in a large-scale trial.
trial registrationClinicaltrials.com, NCT02204852 (July 30, 2014); EudraCT no. 2014-002440-41.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.