Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31488182›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2019

Waterproof, low-cost, long-battery-life sound trap for surveillance of male Aedes aegypti for rear-and-release mosquito control programmes.

Barukh B Rohde, Kyran M Staunton, Nicholas C Zeak, Nigel Beebe, Nigel Snoad, Artiom Bondarenco, Catherine Liddington, Jason A Anderson, Wei Xiang, Richard W Mankin and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The MosHouseInsects · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. DesigningInsects · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Barukh B RohdeDepartment of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. barukh94-work@yahoo.com.
Kyran M StauntonCollege of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Cairns, Australia.
Nicholas C ZeakDepartment of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Nigel BeebeHealth and Biosecurity, CSIRO, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Nigel SnoadVerily Life Sciences, 259 East Grand Avenue, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA.
Artiom BondarencoLand and Water, CSIRO, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Catherine LiddingtonHealth and Biosecurity, CSIRO, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Jason A AndersonHealth and Biosecurity, CSIRO, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Wei XiangCollege of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Cairns, QLD, 4878, Australia.
Richard W MankinCenter for Medical, Agricultural, and Veterinary Entomology, US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Gainesville, FL, USA. Richard.Mankin@ars.usda.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3369-8110
Scott A RitchieCollege of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Cairns, Australia.

Funding

National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship DGE 1315138
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSterile male rear-and-release programmes are of growing interest for controlling Aedes aegypti, including use an "incompatible insect technique" (IIT) to suppress transmission of dengue, Zika, and other viruses. Under IIT, males infected with Wolbachia are released into the suppression area to induce cytoplasmic incompatibility in uninfected populations. These and similar mosquito-release programmes require cost-effective field surveys of both sexes to optimize the locations, timing, and quantity of releases. Unfortunately, traps that sample male Ae. aegypti effectively are expensive and usually require mains power. Recently, an electronic lure was developed that attracts males using a 484 Hz sinusoidal tone mimicking the female wingbeat frequencies, broadcast in a 120 s on/off cycle. When deployed in commercially available gravid Aedes traps (GATs), the new combination, sound-GAT (SGAT), captures both males and females effectively. Given its success, there is interest in optimizing SGAT to reduce cost and power usage while maximizing catch rates.

methodsOptions considered in this study included use of a smaller, lower-power microcontroller (Tiny) with either the original or a lower-cost speaker (lcS). A 30 s on/off cycle was tested in addition to the original 120 s cycle to minimize the potential that the longer cycle induced habituation. The original SGAT was compared against other traps incorporating the Tiny-based lures for mosquito capture in a large semi-field cage. The catch rates in waterproofed versions of this trap were then compared with catch rates in standard [BG-Sentinel 2 (BGS 2); Biogents AG, Regensburg, Germany] traps during an IIT field study in the Innisfail region of Queensland, Australia in 2017.

resultsThe system with a low-power microcontroller and low-cost speaker playing a 30 s tone (Tiny-lcS-30s) caught the highest proportion of males. The mean proportions of males caught in a semi-field cage were not significantly different among the original design and the four low-power, low-cost versions of the SGAT. During the IIT field study, the waterproofed version of the highest-rated, Tiny-lcS-30s SGAT captured male Ae. aegypti at similar rates as co-located BGS-2 traps.

conclusionsPower- and cost-optimized, waterproofed versions of male Ae. aegypti acoustic lures in GATs are now available for field use in areas with sterile male mosquito rear-and-release programmes.

Indexed as

SoundAedesAnimalsCosts and Cost AnalysisDengueFemaleMaleMosquito ControlMosquito VectorsVirus DiseasesZika Virus InfectionFemale wingbeatGravid Aedes TrapVector control

Identifiers

PMID31488182
PMCPMC6729019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.