Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31488068›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2019

Fast and accurate average genome size and 16S rRNA gene average copy number computation in metagenomic data.

Emiliano Pereira-Flores, Frank Oliver Glöckner, Antonio Fernandez-Guerra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Increasing pesticide diversity impairs soil microbial functions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emiliano Pereira-FloresMicrobial Genomics and Bioinformatics Research Group, Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Celsiusstraße 1, 28359, Bremen, Germany. epereira@mpi-bremen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5830-3328
Frank Oliver GlöcknerMicrobial Genomics and Bioinformatics Research Group, Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Celsiusstraße 1, 28359, Bremen, Germany.
Antonio Fernandez-GuerraMicrobial Genomics and Bioinformatics Research Group, Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Celsiusstraße 1, 28359, Bremen, Germany. afernand@mpi-bremen.de.

Funding

Agencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovación POS_EXT_2012_1_10105Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst 57129354Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 634486
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMetagenomics caused a quantum leap in microbial ecology. However, the inherent size and complexity of metagenomic data limit its interpretation. The quantification of metagenomic traits in metagenomic analysis workflows has the potential to improve the exploitation of metagenomic data. Metagenomic traits are organisms' characteristics linked to their performance. They are measured at the genomic level taking a random sample of individuals in a community. As such, these traits provide valuable information to uncover microorganisms' ecological patterns. The Average Genome Size (AGS) and the 16S rRNA gene Average Copy Number (ACN) are two highly informative metagenomic traits that reflect microorganisms' ecological strategies as well as the environmental conditions they inhabit.

resultsHere, we present the ags.sh and acn.sh tools, which analytically derive the AGS and ACN metagenomic traits. These tools represent an advance on previous approaches to compute the AGS and ACN traits. Benchmarking shows that ags.sh is up to 11 times faster than state-of-the-art tools dedicated to the estimation AGS. Both ags.sh and acn.sh show comparable or higher accuracy than existing tools used to estimate these traits. To exemplify the applicability of both tools, we analyzed the 139 prokaryotic metagenomes of TARA Oceans and revealed the ecological strategies associated with different water layers.

conclusionWe took advantage of recent advances in gene annotation to develop the ags.sh and acn.sh tools to combine easy tool usage with fast and accurate performance. Our tools compute the AGS and ACN metagenomic traits on unassembled metagenomes and allow researchers to improve their metagenomic data analysis to gain deeper insights into microorganisms' ecology. The ags.sh and acn.sh tools are publicly available using Docker container technology at https://github.com/pereiramemo/AGS-and-ACN-tools .

Indexed as

Gene DosageGenome SizeBenchmarkingDatabases, GeneticDNA Copy Number VariationsMetagenomeMetagenomicsOceans and SeasRNA, Ribosomal, 16STime FactorsRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNA gene average copy numberAverage genome sizeFunctional traitsMetagenomicsMicrobial ecology

Identifiers

PMID31488068
PMCPMC6727555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.