ReviewBMC medical research methodology2019
A snapshot of pneumonia research activity and collaboration patterns (2001-2015): a global bibliometric analysis.
Review in BMC medical research methodology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A scientometric study of Iran and the world countries' contribution to internal medicine (1996-2019).Caspian journal of internal medicine · 2022Article
- Application of artificial intelligence in glioma researches: A bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Thematic research clusters in very old populations (≥ 80 years): a bibliometric approach.BMC geriatrics · 2021Article
- Research Trends and Collaboration Patterns on Polymyxin Resistance: A Bibliometric Analysis (2010-2019).Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
- Article
- HIV/AIDS research in Africa and the Middle East: participation and equity in North-South collaborations and relationships.Globalization and health · 2020Article
- From cut-points to key players in co-authorship networks: a case study in ventilator-associated pneumonia research.Scientometrics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis article describes a bibliometric review of the scientific production, geographical distribution, collaboration, impact, and subject area focus of pneumonia research indexed on the Web of Science over a 15-year period.
methodsWe searched the Web of Science database using the Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) of "Pneumonia" from January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2015. The only document types we studied were original articles and reviews, analyzing descriptive indicators by five-year periods and the scientific production by country, adjusting for population, economic, and research-related parameters.
resultsA total of 22,694 references were retrieved. The number of publications increased steadily over time, from 981 publications in 2001 to 1977 in 2015 (R
conclusionsPneumonia research increased steadily over the 15-year study period, with Europe and North America leading scientific production. About a fifth of all papers reflected international collaborations, and these were most evident in papers from sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.