ArticleBMC medical research methodology2019
Explaining differential item functioning focusing on the crucial role of external information - an example from the measurement of adolescent mental health.
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Measurement properties of the Swedish version of the Knee Self-Efficacy Scale: A Rasch analysis.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Article
- Improving outcome measures in late onset Pompe disease: Modified Rasch-Built Pompe-Specific Activity scale.European journal of neurology · 2024Article
- Challenges in measurement of adolescent mental health: how are gender patterns affected when level of symptoms is analysed simultaneously with impairment?BMC medical research methodology · 2024Article
- Development of the Young Disability Questionnaire (spine) for children with spinal pain: field testing in Danish school children.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Application of the Rasch measurement model in rehabilitation research and practice: early developments, current practice, and future challenges.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2023Article
- Novel insights regarding the measurement properties of the SCOPA-AUT.BMC neurology · 2022Article
- Item response theory and differential test functioning analysis of the HBSC-Symptom-Checklist across 46 countries.BMC medical research methodology · 2022Article
- The HLSInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Towards a more inclusive and equitable developmental cognitive neuroscience.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2021Review
- Using the Rasch measurement theory to assess the psychometric properties of the Hopkins Symptom Checklist-10 in adolescents.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2021Article
- Social Networks Addiction (SNA-6) - Short: Validity of Measurement in Mexican Youths.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Using Rasch measurement theory to assess the psychometric properties of a depressive symptoms scale in Norwegian adolescents.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2020Article
- Assessing vulnerability to risk of suicide and self-harm in prisoners: a Rasch analysis of the suicide concerns for offenders in the prison environment (SCOPE-2).BMC psychiatry · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAn overarching objective in research comparing different sample groups is to ensure that the reported differences in outcomes are not affected by differences between groups in the functioning of the measurement instruments, i.e. the items have to work in the same way for the different sample groups to be compared. Lack of invariance across sample groups are commonly called Differential Item Functioning (DIF). There is a sense in which the DIF of an item can be taken account of by resolving (splitting) the item into group specific items, rather than deleting the item. Resolving improves fit, retains the reliability and content provided by the item, and compensates for the DIF in estimation of person parameters on the scale of the instrument. However, it destroys invariance of the item's parameter value among the groups. Whether or not a DIF item should be resolved depends on whether the source of the DIF is relevant or irrelevant for the content of the variable. The present paper shows how external information can be used to investigate if the gender DIF found in the item "Stomach ache" in a psychosomatic symptoms scale used among adolescents may reflect abdominal pain because of a biological factor, the girls' menstrual periods.
methodsSwedish data from the international Health Behaviour in School-aged Children study (HBSC) collected in 2005/06, 2009/10 and 2013/14 were used, comprising a total of 18,983 students in grades 5, 7 and 9. A composite measure of eight items of psychosomatic problems was analysed for DIF with respect to gender and menstrual periods using the Rasch model.
resultsThe results support the hypothesis that the source of the gender DIF for the item "Stomach ache" is a gender specific biological factor. In that case the DIF should be resolved if the psychosomatic measure is not intended to tap information about abdominal pain caused by a gender specific biological factor. In contrast, if the measure is intended to tap such information, the DIF should not be resolved.
conclusionsThe conceptualisation of the measure governs whether the item showing DIF should be resolved or not.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.