ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2019
Quality Evaluation of Ophiopogonis Radix from Two Different Producing Areas.
Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nourishing Yin traditional Chinese medicine: potential role in the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes.American journal of translational research · 2024Review
- Phylogeography of cultivated and wild ophiopogon japonicus based on chloroplast DNA: exploration of the origin and sustainable cultivation.BMC plant biology · 2023Article
- Protected Geographical Indication Discrimination of Zhejiang and Non-ZhejiangMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- ccTCM: A quantitative component and compound platform for promoting the research of traditional Chinese medicine.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Article
- Identification of active compounds in Ophiopogonis Radix from different geographical origins by UPLC-Q/TOF-MS combined with GC-MS approaches.Open life sciences · 2022Article
- L-Borneol 7-O-[Journal of immunology research · 2022Article
- The Application of UHPLC-HRMS for Quality Control of Traditional Chinese Medicine.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Review
- Quality Evaluation of Traditional Chinese Medicine Prescription in Naolingsu Capsule Based on Combinative Method of Fingerprint, Quantitative Determination, and Chemometrics.Journal of analytical methods in chemistry · 2022Article
- Distribution Patterns for Bioactive Constituents in Pericarp, Stalk and Seed of Forsythiae Fructus.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Evaluation of the Effects of Paclobutrazol and Cultivation Years on Saponins inInternational journal of analytical chemistry · 2020Article
- A Method to Study the Distribution Patterns for Metabolites in Xylem and Phloem of Spatholobi Caulis.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ophiopogonis Radix, also known as Mai-dong in Chinese, was a commonly used traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and functional health food. Two products of Ophiopogonis Radix are largely produced in the Sichuan and Zhejiang province, which are called "Chuan maidong (CMD)" and "Zhe maidong (ZMD)" respectively. To distinguish and evaluate the quality of CMD and ZMD, an analytical method based on ultra-fast performance liquid chromatography coupled with triple quadrupole-linear ion trap mass spectrometry (UFLC-QTRAP-MS/MS) was established for simultaneous determination of 32 constituents including 4 steroidal saponins, 3 homisoflavonoids, 15 amino acids, and 10 nucleosides in 27 Mai-dong samples from Sichuan and Zhejiang. Furthermore, principal components analysis (PCA), partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA),
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.