ArticleGenetics and molecular biology2020
Large miRNA survival analysis reveals a prognostic four-biomarker signature for triple negative breast cancer.
Article in Genetics and molecular biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unraveling Biomarker Signatures in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review for Targeted Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Pooled it
- Time- and dose-dependent regulation of circular RNAs in the response of triple-negative breast cancer cells to ionizing radiation.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Article
- High uPAR and Low miR-221 Expression Predict Poor Disease-Free Survival in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2026Article
- Role of tumor‑infiltrating lymphocytes and miR‑155 in breast cancer: Insights into carcinogenesis and their potential as prognostic biomarkers (Review).Oncology reports · 2026Review
- Construction of a novel radioresistance-related signature for prediction of prognosis, immune microenvironment and anti-tumour drug sensitivity in non-small cell lung cancer.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- The miR-1305/KLF5 negative regulatory loop affects pancreatic cancer cell proliferation and apoptosis.Human cell · 2025Article
- Oncoinformatic screening of the gene clusters involved in the HER2-positive breast cancer formation along with the in silico pharmacodynamic profiling of selective long-chain omega-3 fatty acids as the metastatic antagonists.Molecular diversity · 2023Article
- Blood Circulating Non-Coding RNAs for the Clinical Management of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Cancers · 2022Review
- Effects of IncRNA PROX1-AS1 on Proliferation, Migration, Invasion and Apoptosis of Lung Cancer Cells by Regulating MiR-1305.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Article
- Modulatory role of miRNAs in thyroid and breast cancer progression and insights into their therapeutic manipulation.Current research in pharmacology and drug discovery · 2022Review
- The Role of MicroRNA as Clinical Biomarkers for Breast Cancer Surgery and Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- The Ambivalent Role of miRNAs in Carcinogenesis: Involvement in Renal Cell Carcinoma and Their Clinical Applications.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- LINC00184 Promotes Ovarian Cancer Cells Proliferation and Cisplatin Resistance by Elevating CNTN1 Expression via Sponging miR-1305.OncoTargets and therapy · 2021Article
- Modulatory Role of microRNAs in Triple Negative Breast Cancer with Basal-Like Phenotype.Cancers · 2020Review
- Circ0120816 acts as an oncogene of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by inhibiting miR-1305 and releasing TXNRD1.Cancer cell international · 2020Article
- A panel of eight microRNAs is a good predictive parameter for triple-negative breast cancer relapse.Theranostics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is currently the only major breast tumor subtype without effective targeted therapy and, as a consequence, usually presents a poor outcome. Due to its more aggressive phenotype, there is an urgent clinical need to identify novel biomarkers that discriminate individuals with poor prognosis. We hypothesize that miRNAs can be used to this end because they are involved in the initiation and progression of tumors by altering the expression of their target genes. To identify a prognostic biomarker in TNBC, we analyzed the miRNA expression of a cohort composed of 185 patients diagnosed with TNBC using penalized Cox regression models. We identified a four-biomarker signature based on miR-221, miR-1305, miR-4708, and RMDN2 expression levels that allowed for the subdivision of TNBC into high- or low-risk groups (Hazard Ratio - HR = 0.32; 95% Confidence Interval - CI = 0.11-0.91; p = 0.03) and are also statistically associated with survival outcome in subgroups of postmenopausal status (HR = 0.19; 95% CI = 0.04-0.90; p= 0.016), node negative status (HR = 0.12; 95% CI = 0.01-1.04; p = 0.026), and tumors larger than 2cm (HR = 0.21; 95% CI = 0.05-0.81; p = 0.021). This four-biomarker signature was significantly associated with TNBC as an independent prognostic factor for survival.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.