Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31487218›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2019

Safety and Efficacy of Nivolumab Monotherapy in Recurrent or Metastatic Cervical, Vaginal, or Vulvar Carcinoma: Results From the Phase I/II CheckMate 358 Trial.

R Wendel Naumann, Antoine Hollebecque, Tim Meyer, Michael-John Devlin, Ana Oaknin, Joseph Kerger, Jose M López-Picazo, Jean-Pascal Machiels, Jean-Pierre Delord, Thomas R J Evans and 9 more

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 259 papers, 14 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
259citing papers in PubMed, 14 pooled it
44.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02488759 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

Non-Comparative, Open-Label, Multiple Cohort, Phase 1/2 Study of Nivolumab Monotherapy and Nivolumab Combination Therapy in Subjects With Virus-Positive and Virus-Negative Solid Tumors

TypeinterventionalSponsorBristol-Myers SquibbRan2015 to 2022Enrolled578ConditionsVarious Advanced CancerArmsNivolumab, Ipilimumab, Relatlimab, Daratumumab
NCT05437692 phase2unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective, Single Arm, Phase II Clinical Study on the Treatment of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer (Ⅱ B to Ⅳ a) With Zimberelimab Combined With Concurrent Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorShanghai Zhongshan HospitalRan2022 to 2025Enrolled19ConditionsLocally Advanced Cervical CancerArmszimberelimab combined With concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy
NCT05492123 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Phase II Study to Evaluate Induction Nivolumab-Ipilimumab, Followed by Nivolumab With Chemoradiotherapy Versus Chemoradiotherapy for Advanced Cervical Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Israelita Albert EinsteinRan2022 to 2028Enrolled112ConditionsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsArmsNivolumab 40 mg in 4 ml Injection, Ipilimumab 200 MG in 40 ML Injection, Chemoradiation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

259 citing papers in PubMed, 14 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 425 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical Outcomes of Immunosuppressant Drugs in Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. European Society of Gynaecological Oncology Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Vulvar Cancer - Update 2023.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2023
    Guideline
  12. Guideline
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

199 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 13 institutions in 8 countries.

R Wendel NaumannLevine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC.
Antoine HollebecqueGustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Tim MeyerUCL Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom.
Michael-John DevlinUCL Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom.
Ana OakninVall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain.
Joseph KergerInstitut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Jose M López-PicazoClínica Universidad de Navarra, Navarra, Spain.
Jean-Pascal MachielsInstitut Roi Albert II, Service d'Oncologie Médicale, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc and Institut de Recherche Clinique et Expérimentale (IREC, Pole MIRO), UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Jean-Pierre DelordIUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse, France.
Thomas R J EvansUniversity of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Valentina BoniSTART Madrid Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal, Madrid, Spain.
Emiliano CalvoSTART Madrid Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal, Madrid, Spain.
Suzanne L TopalianJohns Hopkins Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy and Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD.
Tian ChenBristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ.
Ibrahima SoumaoroBristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ.
Bin LiBristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ.
Junchen GuBristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ.
Ricardo ZwirtesBristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ.
Kathleen N MooreStephenson Cancer Center at the University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, and Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN.
Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States) · USOncoMed (United States) · USBloomberg (United States) · USBristol-Myers Squibb (Germany) · DEClinica Universidad de Navarra · ESCliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BEClovis Oncology (United Kingdom) · GBCRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence · GBInstitut Jules Bordet · BEInstitut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse Oncopole · FRRoche (Switzerland) · CHSarah Cannon · USUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 11650Cancer Research UK 20409
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNivolumab was assessed in patients with virus-associated tumors in the phase I/II CheckMate 358 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02488759). We report on patients with recurrent/metastatic cervical, vaginal, or vulvar cancers. PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients received nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks. Although patients with unknown human papillomavirus status were enrolled, patients known to have human papillomavirus-negative tumors were ineligible. The primary end point was objective response rate. Duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival, and overall survival were secondary end points. Safety and patient-reported outcomes were exploratory end points.

resultsTwenty-four patients (cervical, n = 19; vaginal/vulvar, n = 5) were enrolled. Most patients had received prior systemic therapy for metastatic disease (cervical, 78.9%; vaginal/vulvar, 80.0%). Objective response rates were 26.3% (95% CI, 9.1 to 51.2) for cervical cancer and 20.0% (95% CI, 0.5 to 71.6) for vaginal/vulvar cancers. At a median follow-up of 19.2 months, median DOR was not reached (range, 23.3 to 29.5+ months; + indicates a censored observation) in the five responding patients in the cervical cohort; the DOR was 5.0 months in the single responding patient in the vaginal/vulvar cohort. Median overall survival was 21.9 months (95% CI, 15.1 months to not reached) among patients with cervical cancer. Any-grade treatment-related adverse events were reported in 12 of 19 patients (63.2%) in the cervical cohort and all five patients in the vaginal/vulvar cohort; there were no treatment-related deaths. In the cervical cohort, nivolumab treatment generally resulted in stabilization of patient-reported outcomes associated with health status and health-related quality of life.

conclusionThe efficacy of nivolumab in patients with recurrent/metastatic cervical and vaginal or vulvar cancers is promising and warrants additional investigation. No new safety signals were identified with nivolumab treatment in this population.

Indexed as

Neoplasm Recurrence, LocalAdultAgedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalDisease ProgressionEuropeFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNivolumabPapillomaviridaeProgression-Free SurvivalTime FactorsUnited StatesUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalNivolumab

Identifiers

PMID31487218
PMCPMC6823884
OpenAlexW2972117663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.