ReviewCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2019
Multimodality Imaging in the Evaluation of Intracardiac Masses.
Review in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nonbacterial Tumorous-Thrombotic Right-Sided Endocarditis in a Young Patient With Testicular Germ Cell Tumor.CASE (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2026Article
- Multimodality Imaging in the Diagnostic Work-Up of Patients With Cardiac Masses:JACC. CardioOncology · 2024Review
- Cor Triatriatum Dexter and Right Atrial Mass Causing Severe Inflow Obstruction.CASE (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2024Article
- Cardiac Masses and Pseudomasses: An Overview about Diagnostic Imaging and Clinical Background.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
- Cardiac metastasis of anaplastic meningioma: a diagnostic challenge with multimodality imaging findings.European heart journal. Case reports · 2023Article
- Percutaneous Intracardiac Mass Extraction in High Surgical-Risk Patients.Journal of medical cases · 2023Article
- Atrial thrombosis: Not only left, think also about right!Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU · 2022Review
- Cardiac Rhabdoid Tumor-A Rare Foe-Case Report and Literature Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Cardiac Masses: The Role of Cardiovascular Imaging in the Differential Diagnosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Masses in right side of the heart: spectrum of imaging findings.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2020Review
- Contribution and performance of multimodal imaging in the diagnosis and management of cardiac masses.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intracardiac masses are classified as neoplastic or non-neoplastic. Prognosis varies based on the diagnosis of the mass since treatment options differ greatly. As novel imaging techniques emerge, a multimodality approach to the evaluation of intracardiac masses becomes an important part of non-invasive evaluation prior to potential surgical planning or oncological treatment. The purpose of this article is to compare the available imaging modalities-echocardiography, cardiovascular magnetic resonance, cardiac computed tomography, nuclear imaging, and emerging novel hybrid imaging techniques for future clinical applications-and to review the characteristic features seen on those modalities for the most common intracardiac masses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31486926What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.