Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31486915›Full record

Trial reportKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2019

Biceps tenotomy has earlier pain relief compared to biceps tenodesis: a randomized prospective study.

Elshaday S Belay, Jocelyn R Wittstein, Grant E Garrigues, Tally E Lassiter, Melissa Scribani, Richard D Goldner, Christopher A Bean

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. [Effectiveness comparison of arthroscopic intertubercular groove and open subpectoral tenodesis for long head of biceps tendon tendinopathy].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Elshaday S BelayDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3000, Durham, NC, 27710, UK. Elshaday.Belay@duke.edu.
Jocelyn R WittsteinDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3000, Durham, NC, 27710, UK.
Grant E GarriguesMidwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, USA.
Tally E LassiterDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3000, Durham, NC, 27710, UK.
Melissa ScribaniCenter for Biostatistics, Bassett Research Institute, Cooperstown, USA.
Richard D GoldnerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3000, Durham, NC, 27710, UK.
Christopher A BeanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3000, Durham, NC, 27710, UK.
Duke University Hospital · USDurham VA Medical Center · USBassett Medical Center · USDuke Medical Center · USRush University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSurgical management for long head of the biceps (LHB) tendinopathy with either biceps tenotomy or tenodesis is a reliable, but debated treatment option. The aim of this prospective, randomized, single-blinded study is to evaluate differences in pain relief and subjective outcomes between biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis for LHB tendinopathy.

methodsSubjects were randomized and blinded to biceps tenotomy versus arthroscopic tenodesis intra-operatively. Outcomes evaluated included subjective patient outcome scores, pain, and cosmetic deformity. Subjective outcomes scores and pain were analyzed using a two-way ANOVA, controlling for concomitant rotator cuff repair. Binary outcomes were compared using Chi-square tests.

resultsThirty-four subjects (31 male, 3 female) with a median age of 56 (range 30-77) were enrolled. Twenty subjects were randomized to tenotomy and 14 to tenodesis. Fifty-six percent had concomitant rotator cuff repairs. The mean VAS pain score at 3 months was lower with tenotomy versus tenodesis. 2-year follow-up demonstrated no statistically significant differences for VAS, ASES, or SANE. 15/20 (75%) subjects with biceps tenotomy reported no pain medication use at the 2-week postoperative visit versus 5/14 (33%) for biceps tenodesis. Popeye deformity was found in 5/20 (25%) of tenotomy subjects versus 1/14 (7%) in tenodesis subjects.

conclusionOutcomes appear similar between biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis; however, the tenotomy group demonstrated greater incidence of cosmetic deformity but an earlier improvement in postoperative pain. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Treatment Studies, Level II.

Indexed as

ArthroscopyTenodesisTenotomyAdultAgedEstheticsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRotator Cuff InjuriesShoulder JointShoulder PainSingle-Blind MethodTendinopathyArthroscopyBicep tenodesisProspectiveRandomizedTenotomy

Identifiers

PMID31486915
OpenAlexW2971384434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.