Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31486875›Full record

ReviewPsychopharmacology2021

The potential of

Alice Egerton

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Psychopharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alice EgertonDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, UK. Alice.Egerton@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2939-064X
King's College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L003988/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleProton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (

objectivesThis review focuses on the utility of single-voxel

resultsOverall, these studies indicate that

conclusionsConsiderations for future research include the sensitivity of single-voxel

Indexed as

Drug DevelopmentAcamprosateAlcoholismBrainCentral Nervous System AgentsGlutamic AcidHumansKetamineNeuroimagingProton Magnetic Resonance SpectroscopyReproducibility of ResultsAcamprosateCentral Nervous System AgentsGlutamic AcidKetamineBiomarkersDrug developmentGABAGlutamateMagnetic resonance spectroscopyPsychiatry

Identifiers

PMID31486875
PMCPMC8062504
OpenAlexW2972066407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.