Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31486585›Full record

ArticleStem cells translational medicine2019

Long-Term Results of Cultured Limbal Stem Cell Versus Limbal Tissue Transplantation in Stage III Limbal Deficiency.

Vincent M Borderie, Djida Ghoubay, Cristina Georgeon, Marie Borderie, Céline de Sousa, Anne Legendre, Hélène Rouard

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cells translational medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01619189 (Thérapie Cellulaire au Cours Des Syndromes d'Insuffisance en Cellules Souches Limbiques), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01619189 phase2completednot on this map

Thérapie Cellulaire au Cours Des Syndromes d'Insuffisance en Cellules Souches Limbiques

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Hospitalier National d'Ophtalmologie des Quinze-VingtsRan2007 to 2017Enrolled14ConditionsLimbal DeficiencyArmsepithelial stem cells cultured, transplantation of cultured cells
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Concise Review: Bioengineering of Limbal Stem Cell Niche.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Regenerative therapy for the Cornea.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vincent M BorderieCentre Hospitalier National d'Ophtalmologie des 15-20, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1395-8483
Djida GhoubayCentre Hospitalier National d'Ophtalmologie des 15-20, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Cristina GeorgeonCentre Hospitalier National d'Ophtalmologie des 15-20, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Marie BorderieCentre Hospitalier National d'Ophtalmologie des 15-20, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Céline de SousaBanque de tissus, Etablissement Français du Sang-Ile-de-France, Paris, France.
Anne LegendreBanque de tissus, Etablissement Français du Sang-Ile-de-France, Paris, France.
Hélène RouardBanque de tissus, Etablissement Français du Sang-Ile-de-France, Paris, France.
Sorbonne Université · FRÉtablissement Français du Sang · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to evaluate efficiency and safety of transplantation of limbal stem cells (LSC) cultured on human amniotic membrane with no feeders and to compare cultured LSC with limbal tissue transplantation. Thirty eyes with stage III LSC deficiency were treated with autologous (autoLSC) or allogeneic (alloLSC) cultured LSC transplantation (prospective phase II clinical trial; average follow-up time, 72 months) or autologous (autoLT) or allogeneic (alloLT) limbal tissue transplantation (retrospective control group; average follow-up time, 132 months) between 1993 and 2014. The 5-year graft survival defined by absence of recurrence of the clinical signs of limbal deficiency was 71% for autoLSC, 0% for alloLSC, 75% for autoLT, and 33% for alloLT. Visual acuity improved by 9.2 lines for autoLSC and 3.3 lines for autoLT. It decreased by 0.7 lines for alloLSC and 1.9 lines for alloLT. Adverse events were recorded in 1/7 autoLSC, 7/7 alloLSC, 6/8 autoLT, and 8/8 alloLT patients. Corneal epithelial defect was the only adverse event recorded after autoLSC, whereas severe sight-threatening adverse events were recorded in the remaining three groups. Compared with failed grafts, successful grafts featured greater decrease in fluorescein staining, greater superficial vascularization-free corneal area, lower variability of the corneal epithelial thickness, and higher corneal epithelial basal cell density. Autologous cultured LSC transplantation was associated with high long-term survival and dramatic improvement in vision and was very safe. Autologous limbal tissue transplantation resulted in similar efficiency but was less safe. Cadaver allogeneic grafts resulted in low long-term success rate and high prevalence of serious adverse events. Stem Cells Translational Medicine 2019;8:1230&1241.

Indexed as

Graft SurvivalAdolescentAdultAgedCorneal DiseasesEpithelium, CornealEye BurnsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLimbus CorneaeMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesAdverse eventsCorneaLimbal stem cellSurvivalTransplantationVisual acuity

Identifiers

PMID31486585
PMCPMC6877763
OpenAlexW2971954408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.