Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31486184›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2019

A mixed-methods exploration of non-attendance at diabetes appointments using peer researchers.

Claire Eades, Helen Alexander

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Partnering with older people as peer researchers.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. A mixed-methods exploration of non-attendance at diabetes appointments using peer researchers.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Claire EadesFaculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4845-332X
Helen AlexanderNHS Lanarkshire, Bothwell, UK.
NHS Lanarkshire · GBUniversity of Stirling · GB

Funding

Scottish Diabetes Group
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-attendance at diabetes appointments is costly to the health service and linked with poorer patient outcomes.

objectivePeer researchers aimed to conduct interviews and survey people who miss appointments about their beliefs and perceptions regarding their diabetes and diabetes appointments.

designA mixed-methods cross-sectional design with interviews conducted by peer researchers with diabetes and a questionnaire was used. SETTING AND

participantsPeer researchers conducted semi-structured telephone interviews in one health board in Scotland with ten people who had missed diabetes appointments. A further 34 people who had missed appointments completed a questionnaire. The study was informed by two psychological theories (the Theory of Planned Behaviour and the Self-Regulation Model), and interviews were analysed using thematic analysis.

resultsInterviewees planned to attend appointments but practical barriers, low perceived value of appointments and the feeling that diabetes had little impact upon their lives' emerged as key reasons for missing appointments. Questionnaire data supported these findings and showed that respondents perceived diabetes to have only mildly serious consequence and cause limited concern and emotional impact. Participants' understanding of their condition and perceptions of personal control and treatment control were low. Gender, perceived behavioural control and emotional representations were significantly associated with the number of appointments missed in the previous year.

conclusionsThese findings highlight the importance of psychological variables in predicting non-attendance at diabetes appointments and provide avenues for how non-attendance might be tackled.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes MellitusDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedNo-Show PatientsPatient ParticipationPeer GroupResearch PersonnelSurveys and Questionnairesdiabeteshealth psychologynon-attendancepatient and public involvement

Identifiers

PMID31486184
PMCPMC6882258
OpenAlexW2972234792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.