Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31486027›Full record

Observational studyNeurocritical care2020

Global Survey of Outcomes of Neurocritical Care Patients: Analysis of the PRINCE Study Part 2.

Chethan P Venkatasubba Rao, Jose I Suarez, Renee H Martin, Colleen Bauza, Alexandros Georgiadis, Eusebia Calvillo, J Claude Hemphill, Gene Sung, Mauro Oddo, Fabio Silvio Taccone and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Neurocritical care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06776107 (Factors Associated With Mortality in Brain Injury at the Intensive Care Unit. A Cross-sectional Trial, 2019-2023), which is not on this map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06776107 completednot on this map

Factors Associated With Mortality in Brain Injury at the Intensive Care Unit. A Cross-sectional Trial, 2019-2023 (TraVi II)

TypeobservationalSponsorHospital Departamental de VillavicencioRan2019 to 2024Enrolled80ConditionsTraumatic Brain InjuriesArmsRisk factor present
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. The LINK-Lombardia NeuroIntensive care Network.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Development of web- and mobile-based shared decision-making tools in the neurological intensive care unit.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Review
  8. Evaluating complications in a South African neurocritical care unit: A 1-year retrospective audit.The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society · 2025
    Article
  9. Advancing neurocritical care: Bridging molecular mechanisms and physiological monitoring to neurotherapeutics.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Reducing the incidence and mortality of traumatic brain injury in Latin America.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Chethan P Venkatasubba Rao *Division of Vascular Neurology and Neurocritical Care, Baylor College of Medicine and CHI Baylor St Luke's Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Jose I SuarezDivision of Neurosciences Critical Care, Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Neurology, and Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 1800 Orleans Street, Zayed 3014C, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA. jsuarez5@jhmi.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0548-9936
Renee H MartinMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Colleen BauzaDepartment of Health Informatics, Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital, St. Petersburg, FL, USA.
Alexandros GeorgiadisDivision of Vascular Neurology and Neurocritical Care, Baylor College of Medicine and CHI Baylor St Luke's Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Eusebia CalvilloDivision of Neurosciences Critical Care, Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Neurology, and Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 1800 Orleans Street, Zayed 3014C, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
J Claude HemphillUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Gene SungUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Mauro OddoCHUV Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Fabio Silvio TacconeErasme Hospital and Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.
Peter D LeRouxMain Line Health Care Wynnewood, Wynnewood, PA, USA.
PRINCE Study Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeurocritical care is devoted to the care of critically ill patients with acute neurological or neurosurgical emergencies. There is limited information regarding epidemiological data, disease characteristics, variability of clinical care, and in-hospital mortality of neurocritically ill patients worldwide. We addressed these issues in the Point PRevalence In Neurocritical CarE (PRINCE) study, a prospective, cross-sectional, observational study.

methodsWe recruited patients from various intensive care units (ICUs) admitted on a pre-specified date, and the investigators recorded specific clinical care activities they performed on the subjects during their first 7 days of admission or discharge (whichever came first) from their ICUs and at hospital discharge. In this manuscript, we analyzed the final data set of the study that included patient admission characteristics, disease type and severity, ICU resources, ICU and hospital length of stay, and in-hospital mortality. We present descriptive statistics to summarize data from the case report form. We tested differences between geographically grouped data using parametric and nonparametric testing as appropriate. We used a multivariable logistic regression model to evaluate factors associated with in-hospital mortality.

resultsWe analyzed data from 1545 patients admitted to 147 participating sites from 31 countries of which most were from North America (69%, N = 1063). Globally, there was variability in patient characteristics, admission diagnosis, ICU treatment team and resource allocation, and in-hospital mortality. Seventy-three percent of the participating centers were academic, and the most common admitting diagnosis was subarachnoid hemorrhage (13%). The majority of patients were male (59%), a half of whom had at least two comorbidities, and median Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of 13. Factors associated with in-hospital mortality included age (OR 1.03; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.04); lower GCS (OR 1.20; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.16 for every point reduction in GCS); pupillary reactivity (OR 1.8; 95% CI, 1.09 to 3.23 for bilateral unreactive pupils); admission source (emergency room versus direct admission [OR 2.2; 95% CI, 1.3 to 3.75]; admission from a general ward versus direct admission [OR 5.85; 95% CI, 2.75 to 12.45; and admission from another ICU versus direct admission [OR 3.34; 95% CI, 1.27 to 8.8]); and the absence of a dedicated neurocritical care unit (NCCU) (OR 1.7; 95% CI, 1.04 to 2.47).

conclusionPRINCE is the first study to evaluate care patterns of neurocritical patients worldwide. The data suggest that there is a wide variability in clinical care resources and patient characteristics. Neurological severity of illness and the absence of a dedicated NCCU are independent predictors of in-patient mortality.

Indexed as

Hospital MortalityAcademic Medical CentersAdultAgedAsiaBrain Injuries, TraumaticBrain NeoplasmsCerebral HemorrhageCritical CareDisease ManagementEmergency Service, HospitalEuropeFemaleGlasgow Coma ScaleHealth ResourcesHeart ArrestCritical careNeurocritical careObservational studyOutcomesProspective

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.