Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31486026›Full record

ReviewNeurocritical care2019

Review: Post-Intensive Care Syndrome: Unique Challenges in the Neurointensive Care Unit.

Jamie Nicole LaBuzetta, Jonathan Rosand, Ana-Maria Vranceanu

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurocritical care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Emotional distress in neuro-ICU survivor-caregiver dyads: The recovering together randomized clinical trial.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2022
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Regional scalp block for post-craniotomy pain management in children: a scoping review.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jamie Nicole LaBuzettaDivision of Neurocritical Care, Department of Neurosciences, University of California-San Diego, 9444 Medical Center Drive, ECOB 3-028, MC 7740, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA. jlabuzetta@ucsd.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7498-524X
Jonathan RosandDivision of Neurocritical Care and Emergency Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Ana-Maria VranceanuHenry and Allison McCance Center for Brain Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
Harvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USUniversity of California San Diego · US

Funding

Resilient Together; Developing a resiliency skills program for dyads of patients with young onset dementia and their family caregiversR21NR017979 · NINR · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI VRANCEANU, ANA-MARIA · 2018 to 2019
$673k
NINR NIH HHS R21 NR017979
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Within the last couple of decades, advances in critical care medicine have led to increased survival of critically ill patients, as well as the discovery of notable, long-term health challenges in survivors and their loved ones. The terms post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) and PICS-family (PICS-F) have been used in non-neurocritical care populations to characterize the cognitive, psychiatric, and physical sequelae associated with critical care hospitalization in survivors and their informal caregivers (e.g., family and friends who provide unpaid care). In this review, we first summarize the literature on the cognitive, psychiatric, and physical correlates of PICS and PICS-F in non-neurocritical patient populations and draw attention to their long-term negative health consequences. Next, keeping in mind the distinction between disease-related neurocognitive changes and those that are associated directly with the experience of a critical illness, we review the neuropsychological sequelae among patients with common neurocritical illnesses. We acknowledge the clinical factors contributing to the difficulty in studying PICS in the neurocritical care patient population, provide recommendations for future lines of research, and encourage collaboration among critical care physicians in all specialties to facilitate continuity of care and to help elucidate mechanism(s) of PICS and PICS-F in all critical illness survivors. Finally, we discuss the importance of early detection of PICS and PICS-F as an opportunity for multidisciplinary interventions to prevent and treat new neuropsychological deficits in the neurocritical care population.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingAnxietyBrain DiseasesBrain EdemaBrain Injuries, TraumaticCaregiversCerebral HemorrhageChronic DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionCritical CareCritical IllnessDepressionHumansMuscle WeaknessMuscular DiseasesNeurologyCritical carePICSPICS-familyPost-intensive care syndrome

Identifiers

PMID31486026
PMCPMC7007600
OpenAlexW2972067426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.