Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31485909›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2019

Illusory contour perception in domestic dogs.

Sarah-Elizabeth Byosiere, Philippe A Chouinard, Tiffani J Howell, Pauleen C Bennett

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Do Domestic Dogs (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah-Elizabeth ByosiereSchool of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, P.O. Box 199, Bendigo, Victoria, 3552, Australia. sebyosiere@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3583-6778
Philippe A ChouinardSchool of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, P.O. Box 199, Bendigo, Victoria, 3552, Australia.
Tiffani J HowellSchool of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, P.O. Box 199, Bendigo, Victoria, 3552, Australia.
Pauleen C BennettSchool of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, P.O. Box 199, Bendigo, Victoria, 3552, Australia.
La Trobe University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One way to better understand how animals visually perceive their environment is to assess the way in which visual information is interpreted and adapted based on preconceptions. Domestic dogs represent a unique species in which to evaluate visual perception as recent findings suggest they may differ from humans and other animal species in terms of their susceptibility to geometric visual illusions. Dogs have demonstrated human-like, reversed, and null susceptibility depending on the type of illusion. To further evaluate how dogs perceive their environment, it is necessary to perform additional assessments of visual perception. One such assessment is the perceptual filling-in of figures, which may be invoked when presented with illusory contours. Six dogs were assessed on their perception of the Ehrenstein illusory contour illusion in a two-choice size-discrimination task. Dogs, as a group, demonstrated equivocal perception of illusory contours. Some individual dogs, however, demonstrated human-like perception of the subjective contours, providing preliminary evidence that this species is capable of perceiving illusory contour illusions, thereby improving the current understanding of canine visual perception capabilities. Additional assessments using alternative illusory contour illusions are needed to clarify these results and identify features that underpin the individual differences observed.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, DomesticDogsForm PerceptionIllusionsOptical IllusionsPattern Recognition, VisualDogEhrensteinIllusionIllusory contourPerception

Identifiers

PMID31485909
OpenAlexW2971484179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.