ArticleEuropean radiology2020
Delayed ventilation assessment using fast dynamic hyperpolarised Xenon-129 magnetic resonance imaging.
Article in European radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of an integrated variable flip angle protocol to estimate coil BMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- UltrasensitiveAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- DynamicJHLT open · 2025Article
- Bias field correction in hyperpolarizedMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2022Article
- In vivo methods and applications of xenon-129 magnetic resonance.Progress in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy · 2021Review
- Heterogeneous Parahydrogen-Induced Polarization of Diethyl Ether for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Applications.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2021Article
- Cryptophane-xenon complexes forRSC advances · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate the use of a fast dynamic hyperpolarised
methodsThree male participants (age range 31-43) with healthy lungs and 15 patients (M/F = 12:3, age range = 48-73) with COPD (stages II-IV) underwent spirometry tests, quantitative chest computed tomography (QCT), and DXeV-MRI at 1.5-Tesla. Regional delayed ventilation was captured by measuring the temporal signal change in each lung region of interest (ROI) in comparison to that in the trachea. In addition to its qualitative assessment through visual inspection by a clinical radiologist, delayed ventilation was quantitatively captured by calculating a covariance measurement of the lung ROI and trachea signals, and quantified using both the time delay, and the difference between the integrated areas covered by the signal-time curves of the two signals.
resultsRegional temporal ventilation, consistent with the expected physiological changes across a free breathing cycle, was demonstrated with DXeV-MRI in all patients. Delayed ventilation was observed in 13 of the 15 COPD patients and involved variable lung ROIs. This was in contrast to the control group, where no delayed ventilation was demonstrated (p = 0.0173).
conclusionsDXeV-MRI offers a non-invasive way of detecting and quantifying delayed ventilation in patients with COPD, and provides physiological information on regional pulmonary function during a full breathing cycle. KEY POINTS: • Dynamic xenon MRI allows for the non-invasive detection and measurement of delayed ventilation in COPD patients. • Dynamic xenon MRI during a free breathing cycle can provide unique information about pulmonary physiology and pulmonary disease pathophysiology. • With further validation, dynamic xenon MRI could offer a non-invasive way of measuring collateral ventilation which can then be used to guide lung volume reduction therapy (LVRT) for certain COPD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.