ArticleNeurosurgical review2020
Risk factors for decompressive craniectomy after endovascular treatment in acute ischemic stroke.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Decompressive craniectomy after endovascular thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review.Acta neurochirurgica · 2025Pooled it
- Endovascular thrombectomy for large-core stroke: a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2025Pooled it
- CT hyperdensities after recanalization for anterior circulation large vessels occlusion: a predictor for malignant brain edema after ischemic stroke?Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Article
- Radiomics-based machine learning model for predicting clinically ineffective reperfusion in acute ischaemic stroke patients after endovascular treatment.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- No Harmful Effect of Endovascular Treatment before Decompressive Surgery-Implications for Handling Patients with Space-Occupying Brain Infarction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Timing and causes of death after endovascular thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke.European stroke journal · 2023Observational
- Review of Current Large Core Volume Stroke Thrombectomy Clinical Trials: Controversies and Progress.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2022Review
- Predictors of Decompressive Hemicraniectomy in Successfully Recanalized Patients With Anterior Circulation Emergency Large-Vessel Occlusion.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Temporally distinct myeloid cell responses mediate damage and repair after cerebrovascular injury.Nature neuroscience · 2021Article
- Predicting Factors of Functional Outcome in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Admitted to Neuro-Intensive Care Unit-A Prospective Cohort Study.Brain sciences · 2020Article
- The PRESSURE score to predict decompressive craniectomy after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage.Brain communications · 2020Article
- Robotics in Cerebrovascular Disease: The Final Frontier.Missouri medicineReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endovascular treatment (EVT) is safe and effective for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by large artery occlusion in the anterior circulation. However, some patients require decompressive craniectomy (DC), despite having undergone a timely EVT. This study aimed to evaluate the risk factors for subsequent DC after EVT. This retrospective cohort study comprised 138 patients who received EVT between April 2015 and June 2019 at our center. The need for subsequent DC was defined as cerebral edema or/and hemorrhagic transformation caused by large ischemic infarction, with a ≥ 5-mm midline shift and clinical deterioration after EVT. The relationship between risk factors and DC after EVT was assessed via univariate and multivariable logistic regression. Thirty (21.7%) patients required DC. These patients tended to have atrial fibrillation (P = 0.037), sedation (P = 0.049), mechanical ventilation (P = 0.008), poorer collateral circulation (P = 0.003), a higher baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (P < 0.001), heavier thrombus burden (P < 0.001), a lower baseline Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) (P < 0.001), and unsuccessful recanalization (P < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, higher baseline NIHSS score [odds ratio (OR), 1.17; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.03-1.32], heavier thrombus burden [OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.02-1.79], baseline ASPECTS ≤ 8 [OR, 7.41; 95% CI, 2.43-22.66], and unsuccessful recanalization [OR, 7.49; 95% CI, 2.13-26.36] were independent risk factors for DC after EVT. DC remains an essential treatment for some AIS patients after EVT, especially those with higher baseline NIHSS scores, heavier thrombus burden, baseline ASPECTS ≤ 8, and unsuccessful recanalization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31485788What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.