Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31485788›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical review2020

Risk factors for decompressive craniectomy after endovascular treatment in acute ischemic stroke.

Guoyi Peng, Chuming Huang, Weiqiang Chen, Chukai Xu, Mingfa Liu, Haixiong Xu, Chuwei Cai

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical review, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. CT hyperdensities after recanalization for anterior circulation large vessels occlusion: a predictor for malignant brain edema after ischemic stroke?Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Guoyi PengDepartment of Neurosurgery, Shantou Central Hospital, Affiliated Shantou Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 114 Waima Road, Shantou, 515041, Guangdong, China.
Chuming HuangDepartment of Neurology, Shantou Central Hospital, Affiliated Shantou Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 114 Waima Road, Shantou, 515041, Guangdong, China.
Weiqiang ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Shantou University Medical College, 57 Changping Road, Shantou, 515041, Guangdong, China.
Chukai XuDepartment of Neurology, Shantou Central Hospital, Affiliated Shantou Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 114 Waima Road, Shantou, 515041, Guangdong, China.
Mingfa LiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Shantou Central Hospital, Affiliated Shantou Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 114 Waima Road, Shantou, 515041, Guangdong, China.
Haixiong XuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Shantou Central Hospital, Affiliated Shantou Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 114 Waima Road, Shantou, 515041, Guangdong, China. haixiongxu18@126.com.
Chuwei CaiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Shantou Central Hospital, Affiliated Shantou Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 114 Waima Road, Shantou, 515041, Guangdong, China. cwcai2012@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7157-2124

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endovascular treatment (EVT) is safe and effective for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by large artery occlusion in the anterior circulation. However, some patients require decompressive craniectomy (DC), despite having undergone a timely EVT. This study aimed to evaluate the risk factors for subsequent DC after EVT. This retrospective cohort study comprised 138 patients who received EVT between April 2015 and June 2019 at our center. The need for subsequent DC was defined as cerebral edema or/and hemorrhagic transformation caused by large ischemic infarction, with a ≥ 5-mm midline shift and clinical deterioration after EVT. The relationship between risk factors and DC after EVT was assessed via univariate and multivariable logistic regression. Thirty (21.7%) patients required DC. These patients tended to have atrial fibrillation (P = 0.037), sedation (P = 0.049), mechanical ventilation (P = 0.008), poorer collateral circulation (P = 0.003), a higher baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (P < 0.001), heavier thrombus burden (P < 0.001), a lower baseline Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) (P < 0.001), and unsuccessful recanalization (P < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, higher baseline NIHSS score [odds ratio (OR), 1.17; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.03-1.32], heavier thrombus burden [OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.02-1.79], baseline ASPECTS ≤ 8 [OR, 7.41; 95% CI, 2.43-22.66], and unsuccessful recanalization [OR, 7.49; 95% CI, 2.13-26.36] were independent risk factors for DC after EVT. DC remains an essential treatment for some AIS patients after EVT, especially those with higher baseline NIHSS scores, heavier thrombus burden, baseline ASPECTS ≤ 8, and unsuccessful recanalization.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesDecompressive CraniectomyEndovascular ProceduresFemaleHumansInfarction, Middle Cerebral ArteryIschemic StrokeMaleMiddle AgedNeurosurgical ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsRisk FactorsROC CurveArtery occlusionDecompressive craniectomyMalignant MCA infarctionStrokeThrombectomy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.