Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31485774›Full record

ArticlePlanta2019

Evaluation of potential genetic and chemical markers for Scots pine tolerance against Heterobasidion annosum infection.

Mukrimin Mukrimin, Andriy Kovalchuk, Rajendra P Ghimire, Minna Kivimäenpää, Hui Sun, Jarmo K Holopainen, Fred O Asiegbu

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Planta, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Early-Stage Infection-SpecificInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Genetic variation ofEuropean journal of forest research · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Insects · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Diplodia Tip Blight PathogenJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Mukrimin MukriminDepartment of Forest Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Helsinki, Latokartanonkaari 7, P.O. Box 27, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
Andriy KovalchukDepartment of Forest Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Helsinki, Latokartanonkaari 7, P.O. Box 27, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
Rajendra P GhimireDepartment of Environmental and Biological Sciences, Kuopio Campus, University of Eastern Finland (UEF), P.O. Box 1627, 70211, Kuopio, Finland.
Minna KivimäenpääDepartment of Environmental and Biological Sciences, Kuopio Campus, University of Eastern Finland (UEF), P.O. Box 1627, 70211, Kuopio, Finland.
Hui SunDepartment of Forest Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Helsinki, Latokartanonkaari 7, P.O. Box 27, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
Jarmo K HolopainenDepartment of Environmental and Biological Sciences, Kuopio Campus, University of Eastern Finland (UEF), P.O. Box 1627, 70211, Kuopio, Finland.
Fred O AsiegbuDepartment of Forest Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Helsinki, Latokartanonkaari 7, P.O. Box 27, 00014, Helsinki, Finland. fred.asiegbu@helsinki.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0223-7194
University of Helsinki · FIUniversity of Eastern Finland · FI

Funding

Academy of Finland 278424Academy of Finland 307580
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MAIN

conclusionTwo terpene compounds and four genes were identified as potential biomarkers for further evaluation for Scots pine susceptibility or tolerance against Heterobasidion annosum. Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) is one of the main sources of timber in the boreal zone of Eurasia. Commercial pine plantations are vulnerable to root and butt rot disease caused by the fungus Heterobasidion annosum. The pathogen affects host growth rate, causes higher mortality and decreases in timber quality, resulting in considerable economic losses to forest owners. Genetic and biochemical factors contributing to Scots pine tolerance against H. annosum infection are not well understood. We assessed the predictive values of a set of potential genetic and chemical markers in a field experiment. We determined the expression levels of 25 genes and the concentrations of 36 terpenoid compounds in needles of 16 Scots pine trees randomly selected from a natural population prior to artificial infection. Stems of the same trees were artificially inoculated with H. annosum, and the length of necrotic lesions was documented 5 months post inoculation. Higher expression level of four genes included in our analysis and encoding predicted α-pinene synthase (two genes), geranyl diphosphate synthase (GPPS), and metacaspase 5 (MC5), could be associated with trees exhibiting increased levels of necrotic lesion formation in response to fungal inoculation. In contrast, concentrations of two terpenoid compounds, β-caryophyllene and α-humulene, showed significant negative correlations with the lesion size. Further studies with larger sample size will help to elucidate new biomarkers or clarify the potential of the evaluated markers for use in Scots pine disease resistance breeding programs.

Indexed as

BasidiomycotaBiomarkersDisease ResistanceGenetic MarkersPinus sylvestrisPlant DiseasesPlant LeavesPolymerase Chain ReactionTerpenesTranscriptomeBiomarkersGenetic MarkersTerpenesChemical defencesGene expressionHeterobasidionRoot rot diseaseScots pineTerpenoid

Identifiers

PMID31485774
OpenAlexW2972014276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.