Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31485761›Full record

ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2019

Poly-ε-lysine based hydrogels as synthetic substrates for the expansion of corneal endothelial cells for transplantation.

Stephnie Kennedy, Rebecca Lace, Constandinos Carserides, Andrew G Gallagher, Donald A Wellings, Rachel L Williams, Hannah J Levis

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Squishy matters - Corneal mechanobiology in health and disease.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Amoebicidal Activity of Poly-Epsilon-Lysine Functionalized Hydrogels.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stephnie KennedyDepartment of Eye and Vision Science, Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, University of Liverpool, 6 West Derby Street, Liverpool, L7 8TX, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7143-1885
Rebecca LaceDepartment of Eye and Vision Science, Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, University of Liverpool, 6 West Derby Street, Liverpool, L7 8TX, UK.
Constandinos CarseridesDepartment of Eye and Vision Science, Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, University of Liverpool, 6 West Derby Street, Liverpool, L7 8TX, UK.
Andrew G GallagherSpheriTech Ltd, Business and Technical Park, The Heath, Runcorn, WA7 4QX, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2448-4145
Donald A WellingsSpheriTech Ltd, Business and Technical Park, The Heath, Runcorn, WA7 4QX, UK.
Rachel L WilliamsDepartment of Eye and Vision Science, Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, University of Liverpool, 6 West Derby Street, Liverpool, L7 8TX, UK. rlw@liverpool.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1954-0256
Hannah J LevisDepartment of Eye and Vision Science, Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, University of Liverpool, 6 West Derby Street, Liverpool, L7 8TX, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3923-1178
University of Liverpool · GBSpheriTech (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R015651/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dysfunction of the corneal endothelium (CE) resulting from progressive cell loss leads to corneal oedema and significant visual impairment. Current treatments rely upon donor allogeneic tissue to replace the damaged CE. A donor cornea shortage necessitates the development of biomaterials, enabling in vitro expansion of corneal endothelial cells (CECs). This study investigated the use of a synthetic peptide hydrogel using poly-ε-lysine (pεK), cross-linked with octanedioic-acid as a potential substrate for CECs expansion and CE grafts. PεK hydrogel properties were optimised to produce a substrate which was thin, transparent, porous and robust. A human corneal endothelial cell line (HCEC-12) attached and grew on pεK hydrogels as confluent monolayers after 7 days, whereas primary porcine CECs (pCECs) detached from the pεK hydrogel. Pre-adsorption of collagen I, collagen IV and fibronectin to the pεK hydrogel increased pCEC adhesion at 24 h and confluent monolayers formed at 7 days. Minimal cell adhesion was observed with pre-adsorbed laminin, chondroitin sulphate or commercial FNC coating mix (fibronectin, collagen and albumin). Functionalisation of the pεK hydrogel with synthetic cell binding peptide H-Gly-Gly-Arg-Gly-Asp-Gly-Gly-OH (RGD) or α2β1 integrin recognition sequence H-Asp-Gly-Glu-Ala-OH (DGEA) resulted in enhanced pCEC adhesion with the RGD peptide only. pCECs grown in culture at 5 weeks on RGD pεK hydrogels showed zonula occludins 1 staining for tight junctions and expression of sodium-potassium adenosine triphosphase, suggesting a functional CE. These results demonstrate the pεK hydrogel can be tailored through covalent binding of RGD to provide a surface for CEC attachment and growth. Thus, providing a synthetic substrate with a therapeutic application for the expansion of allogenic CECs and replacement of damaged CE.

Indexed as

Cell ProliferationCorneal TransplantationAnimalsCell AdhesionCells, CulturedEndothelial CellsEndothelium, CornealGuided Tissue RegenerationHumansHydrogelsMaterials TestingPolylysineSwineTissue ScaffoldsHydrogelsPolylysine

Identifiers

PMID31485761
PMCPMC6726667
OpenAlexW2971865686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.