Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31485752›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2019

Risk stratification to improve Pediatric Early Warning Systems: it is all about the context.

Lara Teheux, Carin W Verlaat, Joris Lemson, Jos M T Draaisma, Joris Fuijkschot

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Sedation reversal trends at outpatient ambulatory endoscopic centerWorld journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2024
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Pediatric Early Warning Score in interhospital ambulance care: a pilot study exploring feasibility and impact.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lara TeheuxRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, Amalia Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. lara.teheux@radboudumc.nl.
Carin W VerlaatRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Joris LemsonRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jos M T DraaismaRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, Amalia Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Joris FuijkschotRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, Amalia Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early recognition of critically ill patients is of paramount importance to reduce pediatric mortality and morbidity. We created a risk stratification system combining vital parameters and predefined risk factors aimed at reducing the risk of unrecognized clinical deterioration compared with conventional Pediatric Early Warning Systems (PEWS). This single-center retrospective case cohort study included infants (gestational age ≥ 37 weeks) to adolescents (aged <18 years) with unplanned pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission between April 01, 2014, and February 28, 2018. The sensitivity in the 24 h prior to endpoint of the Pediatric Risk Evaluation and Stratification System (PRESS) was compared with that of the conventional PEWS and calculated as the proportion of study patients who received a high-risk score. Seventy-four PICU admissions were included. PRESS and PEWS sensitivities at 2 h prior to endpoint were 0.70 (95%CI 0.59 to 0.80) and 0.30 (95%CI 0.20 to 0.42) respectively (p < 0.001). Excluding patients with seizures, PRESS sensitivity increased to 0.75 (95%CI 0.64 to 0.85). Forty-nine patients (66%) scored positive on at least one high-risk factor, and "worried sign" was scored in 31 patients (42%).Conclusion: Risk stratification seems advantageous for a faster detection of clinical deterioration, providing opportunity for earlier intervention. What is Known: • Prompt detection of clinical deterioration is of essential importance to reduce morbidity and mortality. • Conventional Pediatric Early Warning Systems (PEWS) have limited sensitivity and a short window of detection of 1 to 2 h. What is New: • Risk stratification based on context factors allows earlier identification of patients at risk, well before deviation of vital signs. • Risk stratification combined with continuous monitoring of deteriorating trends in vital signs could lead to the development of next-generation warning systems achieving true patient safety.

Indexed as

Clinical DeteriorationEarly Warning ScoreCase-Control StudiesChildChild, PreschoolCritical IllnessEarly DiagnosisHumansInfantInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, PediatricRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexEarly warning system (EWS)Health care qualityPatient safetyRisk stratificationTrigger tool

Identifiers

PMID31485752
PMCPMC6733815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.