ArticleWorld journal of urology2020
Biopsy Grade Group as a reliable prognostic factor for BCR in Afro-Caribbean men with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer.
Article in World journal of urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic ancestry and radical prostatectomy findings in Hispanic/Latino patients.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe Grade Group (GG) classification is recommended by guidelines as a reliable prognostic factor of prostate cancer. However, most studies have been performed on the Caucasian population. Our objective was to validate GG classification as a safe way to classify intermediate- and high-risk patients with African ancestry. PATIENTS AND
methodsThis was a retrospective study in an Afro-Caribbean population. A total of 1236 patients were included between 2000 and 2015. Patients were stratified according to (GG). Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, univariate and multivariate analyses using the Cox model.
resultsThere was no significant difference at 5 and 10-year BCR-free survival between the intermediate- and high-risk groups, based on the D'Amico classification. There was a highly significant difference in BCR-free survival at 5 (p < 0.0001) and 10 years (p < 0.0001) for patients of GG 1 and 2 vs 3, 4, and 5, respectively. There was no significant difference in 5-year BCR-free survival of patients of GG grades 1 and 2, whether lymph-node dissection was performed or not. There was a significant difference between GG 2 and 3 patients in 5 (p = 0.008) and 10-year BCR-free survival (p = 0.01). High PSA (p < 0.0001), pathological GG ≥ 3 (p < 0.0001), pathological stage pT3 (p < 0.0001) and positive margins (p < 0.0001) were factors for BCR in multivariate analysis.
conclusionThe GG 2015 classification appears to be a better prognostic factor than D'Amico classification for intermediate- and high-risk Afro-Caribbean patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.