Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31485686›Full record

SynthesisInternational urogynecology journal2020

Diagnostic value of pelvic floor ultrasonography for diagnosis of pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review.

Yuanjing Gao, Zhiwei Zhao, Yanlin Yang, Meiqin Zhang, Jiang Wu, Yali Miao

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International urogynecology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Longitudinal Study of Pelvic Floor Characteristics Before, During, and After Pregnancy in Nulliparous Women.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2022
    Observational
  12. Endometrial SUSD2Journal of personalized medicine · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yuanjing GaoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children of MOE, West China Second University Hospital, West China Campus, Sichuan University, No.17 People's South Road, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Zhiwei ZhaoWest China School of Basic Medical Sciences & Forensic Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yanlin YangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children of MOE, West China Second University Hospital, West China Campus, Sichuan University, No.17 People's South Road, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Meiqin ZhangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children of MOE, West China Second University Hospital, West China Campus, Sichuan University, No.17 People's South Road, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Jiang WuDeep Underground Space Medical Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxuexiang, Chengdu, China. jw@scu.edu.cn.
Yali MiaoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children of MOE, West China Second University Hospital, West China Campus, Sichuan University, No.17 People's South Road, Chengdu, 610041, China. miaoyali2006@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4108-5859
Sichuan University · CNWest China Medical Center of Sichuan University · CN

Funding

Foundation of Chengdu Municipal Science and Technology Program 2018YF0500195SNFoundation of Sichuan Provincial Science and Technology Program 2019YFH0147Foundation of West China Second Hospital Program KX111
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisPelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common medical condition universally. In addition to physical examination, experts have increasingly turned their attention to ultrasound in diagnosing POP for its low cost and dynamic imaging. The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of the methods of pelvic floor ultrasound in diagnosing POP, which has been lacking up till now.

methodsWe included original papers comparing the outcome of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system and ultrasound, published from 2008 to present in English, using electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, PUBMED). All stages of the review were conducted in parallel by two reviewers.

resultsFifteen papers were included. We found that current methods have advantages and limitations. The main methods are to measure levator hiatus-related parameters and distances between the lowest point of the pelvic organs and reference lines during Valsalva maneuver, contraction, and at rest.

conclusionsPelvic floor ultrasound is valuable in diagnosing POP, yet suffers from a weakness in precision compared with physical examination. From the existing research, we found that the differences in baseline data such as weight, height, ethnicity, etc., may affect the cutoffs of the above-mentioned parameters. Further research is required to find one appropriate cutoff for each parameter, even if it is necessary to set group values for every parameter according to varying situations.

Indexed as

UltrasonographyAdultAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPelvic FloorPelvic Organ ProlapsePhysical ExaminationPredictive Value of TestsSensitivity and SpecificityClinical examinationPelvic floor ultrasoundPelvic organ prolapsePOP-Q

Identifiers

PMID31485686
OpenAlexW2971934415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.