Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31485376›Full record

ArticleJournal of periodontal & implant science2019

Assessment of stem cell viability in the initial healing period in rabbits with a cranial bone defect according to the type and form of scaffold.

Seung-Hwan Kang, Jun-Beom Park, InSoo Kim, Won Lee, Heesung Kim

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of periodontal & implant science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Effects of Transforming Growth Factor-BioMed research international · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Evaluation of the Effects ofMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Seung-Hwan KangDepartment of Dental Implantology, The Catholic University of Korea Graduate School of Clinical Dental Science, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8523-0531
Jun-Beom ParkDepartment of Dental Implantology, The Catholic University of Korea Graduate School of Clinical Dental Science, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8915-1555
InSoo KimDepartment of Dental Implantology, The Catholic University of Korea Graduate School of Clinical Dental Science, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5682-2877
Won LeeDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6383-8754
Heesung KimDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8056-3529
Catholic University of Korea · KRKorea University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIncreased bone regeneration has been achieved through the use of stem cells in combination with graft material. However, the survival of transplanted stem cells remains a major concern. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the viability of transplanted mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) at an early time point (24 hours) based on the type and form of the scaffold used, including type I collagen membrane and synthetic bone.

methodsThe stem cells were obtained from the periosteum of the otherwise healthy dental patients. Four symmetrical circular defects measuring 6 mm in diameter were made in New Zealand white rabbits using a trephine drill. The defects were grafted with 1) synthetic bone (β-tricalcium phosphate/hydroxyapatite [β-TCP/HA]) and 1×10

resultsCells were easily separated from the collagen membrane, but not from synthetic bone. The number of stem cells attached to synthetic bone in groups 1, 3, and 4 seemed to be similar. Cellular viability in group 2 was significantly higher than in the other groups (

conclusionsThis study showed that stem cells can be applied when a membrane is used as a scaffold under no or minimal pressure. When space maintenance is needed, stem cells can be loaded onto synthetic bone with a chipped membrane to enhance the survival rate.

Indexed as

Bone transplantationCell survivalMembranesStem cellsTissue scaffolds

Identifiers

PMID31485376
PMCPMC6713805
OpenAlexW2968828820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.