Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31485331›Full record

ArticleMovement ecology2019

Behavioural compass: animal behaviour recognition using magnetometers.

Pritish Chakravarty, Maiki Maalberg, Gabriele Cozzi, Arpat Ozgul, Kamiar Aminian

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Movement ecology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Action Recognition Using a Spatial-Temporal Network for Wild Felines.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Pritish Chakravarty1School of Engineering, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2975-6253
Maiki Maalberg1School of Engineering, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Gabriele Cozzi3Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Arpat Ozgul3Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Kamiar Aminian1School of Engineering, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CHUniversity of Zurich · CHTallinn University of Technology · EE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnimal-borne data loggers today often house several sensors recording simultaneously at high frequency. This offers opportunities to gain fine-scale insights into behaviour from individual-sensor as well as integrated multi-sensor data. In the context of behaviour recognition, even though accelerometers have been used extensively, magnetometers have recently been shown to detect specific behaviours that accelerometers miss. The prevalent constraint of limited training data necessitates the importance of identifying behaviours with high robustness to data from new individuals, and may require fusing data from both these sensors. However, no study yet has developed an end-to-end approach to recognise common animal behaviours such as foraging, locomotion, and resting from magnetometer data in a common classification framework capable of accommodating and comparing data from both sensors.

methodsWe address this by first leveraging magnetometers' similarity to accelerometers to develop biomechanical descriptors of movement: we use the static component given by sensor tilt with respect to Earth's local magnetic field to estimate posture, and the dynamic component given by change in sensor tilt with time to characterise movement intensity and periodicity. We use these descriptors within an existing hybrid scheme that combines biomechanics and machine learning to recognise behaviour. We showcase the utility of our method on triaxial magnetometer data collected on ten wild Kalahari meerkats (

resultsThe overall recognition accuracy of > 94% obtained with magnetometer data was found to be comparable to that achieved using accelerometer data. Interestingly, higher robustness to inter-individual variability in dynamic behaviour was achieved with the magnetometer, while the accelerometer was better at estimating posture.

conclusionsMagnetometers were found to accurately identify common behaviours, and were particularly robust to dynamic behaviour recognition. The use of biomechanical considerations to summarise magnetometer data makes the hybrid scheme capable of accommodating data from either or both sensors within the same framework according to each sensor's strengths. This provides future studies with a method to assess the added benefit of using magnetometers for behaviour recognition.

Indexed as

AccelerometerAngular velocityBehaviour recognitionBiomechanicsEarth’s magnetic fieldMachine learningMagnetometerMeerkats

Identifiers

PMID31485331
PMCPMC6712732
OpenAlexW2970000474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.