Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31485200›Full record

ArticleOccupational therapy international2019

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Hong Kong Version of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HK-KOOS) for Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis.

Andy S K Cheng, Ka-Chun Chan, Sum-Yuet Chan, Miu-Kwan Fan, Man-Kwan Fung, Oi-Yan Lee, Cindy T T Kwok, Jackson K K Wong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Occupational therapy international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andy S K ChengDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7503-5273
Ka-Chun ChanDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Pok Oi Hospital, Au Tau, Yuen Long, Hong Kong.
Sum-Yuet ChanSAHK, Pak Tin Preschool Centre, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Miu-Kwan FanDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Tuen Mun Hospital, 23 Tsing Chung Koon Road, Tuen Mun, Hong Kong.
Man-Kwan FungDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Kwai Chung Hospital, 3-15 Kwai Chung Hospital Road, Kwai Chung, NT, Hong Kong.
Oi-Yan LeePLK Padma & Hari Harilela Integrated Rehabilitation Centre, 310 Kwai Shing Circuit, Kwai Chung, NT, Hong Kong.
Cindy T T KwokDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7688-9032
Jackson K K WongDepartment of Occupational Therapy, United Christian Hospital, 130 Hip Wo Street, Kwun Tong, Hong Kong.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study aimed to validate the Hong Kong version of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HK-KOOS) for patients with knee osteoarthritis.

methodsContent validity was assessed using the Item and Scale Content Validity Index (I-CVI and S-CVI). Test-retest reliability and internal consistency were assessed by the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and Cronbach's alpha. Dimensionality was assessed by performing exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Convergent and Divergent Validity was performed by examining the correlation between the HK-KOOS and the Chinese version of the Short Form 12 (SF-12) Health Survey, the Chinese Modified Barthel Index (C-MBI), and the Visual Analogue Scale for Pain (VAS-Pain). Ceiling and floor effects were also examined.

resultsA total of 125 participants were recruited in this study. In general, all instructions, items, and response options were considered as understandable, indicating a satisfactory cross-cultural adaptation. The I-CVI and S-CVI scores were 0.80-1 and 0.90-1, respectively, indicating excellent content validity in terms of relevance, representativeness, and understandability. The test-retest reliability of all HK-KOOS subscales was satisfactory with ICC exceeding 0.70 for all domains. Cronbach's alpha exceeded 0.80 for all subscales, indicating satisfactory internal consistency. Medium to strong correlations were found between the HK-KOOS and the VAS-Pain, SF-12, and C-MBI. However, factor analysis indicated a seven-factor structure, rather than the original five-factor structure. Items on pain and activities of daily living were loaded in the same factors. A floor effect was present in the sports and recreation subscale. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsFuture studies should further examine the dimensionality of the KOOS. The HK-KOOS is a culturally adapted, reliable, and valid outcome measure instrument to be used in Hong Kong patients with primary knee osteoarthritis.

Indexed as

Occupational TherapyPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresActivities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHong KongHumansKnee InjuriesMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneeReproducibility of ResultsTranslations

Identifiers

PMID31485200
PMCPMC6710745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.