ArticleSaudi journal of biological sciences2019
The effects of density on size-dependent gender plasticity in the monoecious species
Article in Saudi journal of biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo test the fitness-gain curve model proposes that cosexual plants adjust their sex ratios and resource allocation depending on their size. In this study, the monoecious species Sagittaria potamogetifolia was used as a model to determine the effects of plant size and density on gender modification and reproductive allocation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Various traits, including flower number and plant biomass, were measured under four different artificially constructed population density treatments. More male flowers were produced than female flowers per individual at high densities, while the opposite trend was observed at low densities. This trend was particularly evident in the highest density treatment.
resultsA trade-off was discovered between male-female sex allocations in the highest density treatment (40 individuals m
conclusionThus,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.