Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31485034›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2019

Sulfur metabolites in the pelagic ocean.

Mary Ann Moran, Bryndan P Durham

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 191 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Positive bacteria-phage interactions drive sulfamethoxazole removal.Environmental science and ecotechnology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Advances in microbial sulfoquinovose catabolism.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Microbiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mary Ann MoranDepartment of Marine Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA. mmoran@uga.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0702-8167
Bryndan P DurhamSchool of Oceanography, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2253-157X
University of Georgia · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Marine microorganisms play crucial roles in Earth's element cycles through the production and consumption of organic matter. One of the elements whose fate is governed by microbial activities is sulfur, an essential constituent of biomass and a crucial player in climate processes. With sulfur already being well studied in the ocean in its inorganic forms, organic sulfur compounds are emerging as important chemical links between marine phytoplankton and bacteria. The high concentration of inorganic sulfur in seawater, which can readily be reduced by phytoplankton, provides a freely available source of sulfur for biomolecule synthesis. Mechanisms such as exudation and cell lysis release these phytoplankton-derived sulfur metabolites into seawater, from which they are rapidly assimilated by marine bacteria and archaea. Energy-limited bacteria use scavenged sulfur metabolites as substrates or for the synthesis of vitamins, cofactors, signalling compounds and antibiotics. In this Review, we examine the current knowledge of sulfur metabolites released into and taken up from the marine dissolved organic matter pool by microorganisms, and the ecological links facilitated by their diversity in structures, oxidation states and chemistry.

Indexed as

Oceans and SeasArchaeaBacteriaGeologic SedimentsPhytoplanktonSeawaterSulfur CompoundsSulfur Compounds

Identifiers

PMID31485034
OpenAlexW2971750222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.