Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31484972›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Urinary estrogens as a non-invasive biomarker of viable pregnancy in the giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca).

Kirsten S Wilson, Jella Wauters, Iain Valentine, Alan McNeilly, Simon Girling, Rengui Li, Desheng Li, Hemin Zhang, Mick T Rae, Forbes Howie and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Kirsten S WilsonMRC Centre for Reproductive Health, Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, 47 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4TJ, UK. Kirsten.wilson@ed.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6311-8995
Jella WautersLaboratory of Chemical Analysis, Department of Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, 9820, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Iain ValentineRZSS Edinburgh Zoo, 134 Corstorphine Road, Edinburgh, EH12 6TS, UK.
Alan McNeillyMRC Centre for Reproductive Health, Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, 47 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4TJ, UK.
Simon GirlingRZSS Edinburgh Zoo, 134 Corstorphine Road, Edinburgh, EH12 6TS, UK.
Rengui LiChina Conservation and Research Centre for the Giant Panda (CCRCGP), DuJiangYan City, Sichuan Province, China.
Desheng LiChina Conservation and Research Centre for the Giant Panda (CCRCGP), DuJiangYan City, Sichuan Province, China.
Hemin ZhangChina Conservation and Research Centre for the Giant Panda (CCRCGP), DuJiangYan City, Sichuan Province, China.
Mick T RaeSchool of Applied Sciences, Edinburgh Napier University, Sighthill Campus, Edinburgh, EH11 4BN, UK.
Forbes HowieMRC Centre for Reproductive Health, Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, 47 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4TJ, UK.
Ruth AndrewBHF/University of Edinburgh Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Queen's Medical Research Institute, 47 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4TJ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6916-2994
William Colin DuncanMRC Centre for Reproductive Health, Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, 47 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4TJ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7170-5740
MRC Centre for Reproductive Health · GBChengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding · CNRoyal Zoological Society of Scotland · GBCHU Ambroise Paré · BEEdinburgh Napier University · GBThe Queen's Medical Research Institute · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N022556/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Female giant pandas show complex reproductive traits, being seasonally monoestrus, displaying a variable length embryonic diapause and exhibiting pseudopregnancy. Currently, there is no confirmatory non-invasive biomarker of blastocyst implantation or pregnancy. This study aimed to monitor urinary estrogens across gestation in pregnancy (n = 4), pseudopregnancy (n = 4) and non-birth cycles (n = 5) in the giant panda. A pregnancy-specific profile of estrogens corrected for urinary specific gravity was identified during the gestation period. Pregnant females showed increasing concentrations of estrogens for 29 days until birth, no increase was observed during pseudopregnancy and the two profiles were distinguishable from each other for the final 2 weeks of the cycle suggesting the estrogens are of placental origin. This allowed a nomogram, starting at a known fixed point during the cycle, to be created and tested with cycles of known outcome, and cycles which were inseminated but did not result in a birth. Non-birth profiles showed deviations from that of pregnancy. We believe these deviations indicate the point of failure of the placenta to support a developing cub. Non-invasive longitudinal monitoring of estrogen concentrations therefore has the potential to be developed as a panda pregnancy test to predict viable cub development.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkersEstrogensFemalePregnancyUrsidaeBiomarkersEstrogens

Identifiers

PMID31484972
PMCPMC6726647
OpenAlexW2971917724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.