Trial reportScientific reports2019
The Detection and Characterization of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 in Confirmed Measles Cases.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characteristics and Genomic Diversity of Measles Virus From Measles Cases With Known Vaccination Status in Shanghai, China.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Diagnosis of Herpes Simplex Virus: Laboratory and Point-of-Care Techniques.Infectious disease reports · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Based on measles surveillance in Shanghai, People's Republic of China, from 2006 to 2015, we found that measles virus isolates from 40 throat swab samples exhibited atypical cytopathic effects in Vero/hSLAM cells, which was found to be a result of coinfection with measles virus (MeV) and human herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1). Serological and molecular approaches were used to confirm and characterize the coinfections in these patients. Among the 40 measles cases, measles-specific IgM was detected in 37 cases, while measles-specific IgG was detected in 27 cases. HSV-1-specific IgM and IgG were detected in 7 and 34 cases, respectively, suggesting that most of the MeV infections were primary, but that HSV-1 infection was due to the reactivation of latent virus in most cases. The titers of HSV-1 IgG in patients with either measles or measles-HSV-1 coinfection were significantly higher than those in the healthy group (P = 0.0026 and P < 0.0001, respectively); however, there was no significant difference in the titers of HSV-1 IgG in the MeV and MeV-HSV-1 coinfection patients (P = 0.105). Nucleic acids from MeV and HSV-1 were detected in 40 and 39 throat swabs, respectively. Twenty five MeV RNA sequences were genotyped, and all represented genotype H1, which is the endemic genotype in China. Sequences from the glycoprotein G gene of HSV-1 were used to classify the isolates into two distinct phylogenetic groups: 34 belonged to group A and 3 belonged to group B.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.